EIA

This section of Enviro Annotations brings you current news, latest news on EIA, environment impact assessment, environmental issues in Public Hearing, Analysis on environmental clearances, Forest clearance, Forest Approvals, CGWA NOC, groundwater clearances. Subscribe

03.01.2025 YouTube X LinkedIn

The Expert Appraisal Committee (EAC), constituted by the Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change (MoEFCC), for the appraisal of industry 1 sector projects, has approved the proposal from ArcelorMittal Nippon Steel India Limited (AMNSI) seeking the amalgamation of two Environmental Clearances (ECs) for its ongoing and planned expansion projects at Hazira in Surat District, Gujarat. The projects under consideration are the "AMNSI 500 MW Power Plant" and the "Expansion of Integrated Steel Plant from 9.6 to 15.6 MTPA (Liquid Steel)."

Additionally, the approval includes the amendment of the EC for the optimization of layout and product mix, with the installation of a 2.5 MTPA Energy Efficient Thin Slab Caster and Rolling Mill, as per clause 7(ii) of the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Notification, 2006. The key feature of this approval is the inclusion of energy-efficient technology, intended to enhance the plant’s operational efficiency while maintaining the existing production capacity and ensuring minimal impact on the environment.

An EAC document dated 27th December 2024 highlights that the addition of the energy-efficient Thin Slab Caster and Rolling Mill, along with associated auxiliary equipment, will occur within the existing site area. This modification is expected to result in only a marginal increase in pollution load under the product mix category, with no significant change in overall production levels.

AMNSI requested the EAC to consider the proposal under Clause 8 of the Office Memorandum dated 11th April 2022, seeking an exemption from the public consultation (PH) process. The company justified this request on several grounds, including technical considerations such as the addition of 7.18 hectares of regularized forest land and the installation of a 500 MW Captive Power Plant (formerly Essar Power Ltd.), which is aimed at improving plant layout, enhancing process safety, optimizing energy use, and promoting sustainable operations without increasing production or significantly impacting the environment. Socially, AMNSI emphasized that the amendment is part of an ongoing expansion project for which public consultation was previously conducted on 18th July 2022. Moreover, the company has committed to an additional ₹14.5 crore in Corporate Environmental Responsibility (CER) outlay, a sum intended to support local environmental initiatives. The Tapi river, located just 0.2 kilometers from the project site, is also a consideration in the environmental assessment process.

Air Quality Claimed: Regarding air quality monitoring, the company provided a comprehensive overview of PM10 and PM2.5 levels across multiple periods. Data from March 2009 to June 2021 showed PM10 levels ranging from 75 to 91 µg/m³, and from November 2021 to December 2021, the levels varied between 70 and 97 µg/m³. In 2023, PM10 levels reached as high as 100 µg/m³, while PM2.5 levels fluctuated between 18 and 27 µg/m³, reaching a peak of 60 µg/m³ in the same year. AMNSI attributes the high PM10 emissions in part to dust from industrial operations in the Hazira industrial area, as well as fugitive emissions resulting from traffic movement.

Compliance Status: A review of the Conditions Compliance Report (CCR) for the two relevant ECs, compiled by the Integrated Regional Office (IRO) in Gandhinagar, reveals mixed compliance results. Out of 74 conditions in the EC dated 2nd March 2022, 40 conditions were fully complied with, while 9 were partly complied with. Similarly, out of 95 conditions in the EC dated 3rd October 2022, 49 conditions were fully complied with, 4 were partly complied with, and several others remain either agreed to comply or noted as non-applicable.

The air quality monitoring results over multiple periods reveal a fluctuation in particulate matter (PM) levels at the ArcelorMittal Nippon Steel India (AMNSI) project site. Specifically, the PM10 levels varied between 75 and 91 µg/m³ from 7th March 2009 to 6th June 2021, 70 to 97 µg/m³ from 23rd November to 26th December 2021, 73 to 85 µg/m³ from 8th May to 16th June 2023, and reached a peak of 100 µg/m³ in 2023. Similarly, PM2.5 levels fluctuated from 18 to 27 µg/m³, 23 to 50 µg/m³, 20 to 25 µg/m³, and a high of 60 µg/m³ during the same periods. AMNSI has attributed the elevated PM10 emissions to two key sources: dust emissions from the numerous industries located in the Hazira industrial area and fugitive emissions generated by traffic movement. Despite these findings, the compliance status reported by the Integrated Regional Office (IRO) in November 2024 highlights that of the total conditions set for two Environmental Clearances (ECs) granted to the project, a substantial portion is still pending or has been only partially complied with.

The IRO further noted that the project's ongoing expansion to 15.6 MTPA (Million Tonnes Per Annum) has delayed the green belt development due to the extensive use of the site for construction activities, the presence of heavy equipment, and temporary project infrastructure. The report also mentions that annual performance tests on all pollution control systems have only been partially complied with, and several specific conditions related to air pollution control measures, such as independent fume extraction systems and wind barriers for raw material handling, remain either incomplete or partly complied with.

Additionally, the condition mandating the paving of plant roads and provision of industrial vacuum cleaners for regular road cleaning has not been fully met. Monitoring of fugitive emissions is being conducted monthly across eight locations, with reports showing emissions within acceptable limits, but there is room for improvement, especially regarding emissions from process areas and internal roads. The unit has been directed to submit an action plan to address these issues.

Despite these shortcomings, AMNSI’s Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) consultant has reported that the levels of PM10 and PM2.5 are lower than expected, and the existing emissions are not significantly attributable to the project itself. The Environmental Appraisal Committee (EAC), upon reviewing the baseline data from 2021 and 2023, noted a slight reduction in both PM10 and PM2.5 levels. The EAC was also informed that Hazira is a major industrial area with multiple industries and ports, contributing to high PM emissions, particularly due to fugitive dust and traffic-related emissions.

After deliberating on the pollution load assessment and action plans to control these emissions, the EAC found the overall proposal and mitigation efforts satisfactory and approved the proposal under paragraph 7(ii) of the EIA Notification, 2006. However, the EAC recommended that the amalgamated environmental clearance include all relevant conditions from the existing ECs and advised the project proponent to make public the clearance details, including environmental safeguards, in two local newspapers within a week and permanently display them on their website.

Court Cases and Legal Matters: In addition to the EAC’s approval, AMNSI is involved in two ongoing legal cases related to the environmental concerns at the project site. The first, Writ Petition (PIL) 14-2022, was filed at the Gujarat High Court by Roshni Patel on 1st February 2022, alleging unauthorized discharge of industrial effluents into the Tapi Estuary in violation of EC and CCA conditions. The case was registered on 9th February 2022, and the next hearing is scheduled for 10th January 2025.

The second case, Appeal No. 27/2022, was filed by Thakorbhai Vallabhbhai Khalasi at the National Green Tribunal (NGT) Western Zone Bench, Pune, challenging the EC granted on 2nd March 2022, for modifications to the existing plant. The case was registered on 14th July 2022, with the final hearing set for 3rd February 2025.

01.01.2025 YouTube X LinkedIn

The Expert Appraisal Committee (EAC) of the Ministry of Environment, Forest, and Climate Change (MoEF&CC) for River Valley and Hydroelectric Projects has incorporated findings from its sub-committee report on the Tarali Off-Stream Open Loop Pumping Storage Project (PSP) and the Koyna-Nivakane Closed Loop PSP. These updates were recorded in the EAC’s minutes of the meeting dated 30th December 2024.

Tarali Off-Stream Open Loop PSP: The Tarali PSP, proposed by Adani Green Energy Limited, spans an area of 150.74 hectares across the villages of Kalambe, Jalu, Nivade, and Tondoshi in Satara District, Maharashtra. It is located on the Tarali River near Dangistewadi in Patan Taluka and features two reservoirs:

• Lower Reservoir: An existing Tarali reservoir constructed as part of an irrigation project by the Water Resource Department (WRD), Maharashtra.

• Upper Reservoir: Proposed to be constructed over a 1.3 sq km area in Bablamachi.

Designed as an “off-stream open loop” scheme, the project will circulate 10.42 MCM of water between the two reservoirs using a portion of the lower reservoir’s 165.4 MCM live storage capacity.

The EAC granted the Terms of Reference (ToR) for the project during its 34th meeting on 14th September 2022, with the ToR issued on 9th November 2022, and later amended on 3rd January 2024.

As part of a site visit conducted on November 26, 2024, the sub-committee members, Dr. J. A. Johnson and Dr. Purushottam Sakhare, recommended the following:

• Water Flow Management: The upper reservoir lies in a Sahyadri hill valley that feeds the Urmode River, a tributary of the Krishna River. It is essential to calculate annual discharge, including monsoon and spring-fed discharges, and ensure continuous downstream water flow to support riparian livelihoods.

• Non-Explosive Excavation: Tunnel and powerhouse construction should use non-explosive blasting methods to prevent landslides and safeguard nearby percolation tanks and ponds.

• Road Infrastructure: Approach roads to the project site, which pass through local villages, are in poor condition. It is recommended that these roads be upgraded and maintained during the construction and operational phases.

Koyna-Nivakane Closed Loop PSP: The PSP, also proposed by Adani Green Energy Limited, covers 312.84 hectares in Marathwadi Village, Tehsil Patan, Satara District, Maharashtra. This project consists of:

• Lower Reservoir: An incomplete earthen reservoir managed by the WRD at Nivakane.

• Upper Reservoir: Proposed to be constructed in Kathi, Chalkiwadi-Paton Road.

Planned as a “closed loop” scheme, the lower reservoir’s submergence area is 65 hectares, while the upper reservoir’s submergence area is 65.6 hectares. The EAC recommended the grant of ToR during its 48th meeting held on June 26-27, 2023, but postponed final environmental clearance due to the site’s location within the Western Ghats’ eco-sensitive area and proximity to the Sahyadri Tiger Reserve.

The sub-committee’s site visit observations and recommendations include:

• Water Discharge Management: Both reservoirs will obstruct natural water flow in the Kera and Nivakane Rivers. Annual discharge calculations should be conducted to maintain downstream water flow year-round.

• Eco-Sensitive Zone Clearance: The upper reservoir’s western boundary lies within 500 meters of the Sahyadri Tiger Reserve buffer zone and the eco-sensitive zone of Koyna Wildlife Sanctuary. Clearance from the National Board for Wildlife (NBWL) is mandatory under the Wildlife Protection Act, 1972.

• Non-Explosive Construction Methods: Non-explosive blasting methods should be used for tunnel and powerhouse excavation to avoid landslides.

• Road Maintenance: Approach roads to the project site must be repaired and maintained throughout the construction and operational phases.

29 December 2024 YouTube X LinkedIn

The Regional Empowered Committee (REC) at the Bengaluru Regional Office of the Ministry of Environment, Forest, and Climate Change (MoEF&CC) convened the 82nd meeting. The meeting held on 4th December 2024 deliberated on the proposal for diversion of forest land for the Palakkad-Kozhikode NH-966 Highway under the Bharatmala project.

The proposed 121.006 km-long highway project aims to enhance connectivity in Kerala by linking Palakkad and Kozhikode. The project requires the diversion of 9.529 hectares of forest land spread across the Palakkad and Mannarkad forest divisions. Key highlights include:

• Forest Impact: Felling of 2,380 trees, including species like teak (Tectona grandis), rubber (Hevea brasiliensis), and cashew (Anacardium occidentale).

• Wildlife Concerns: The route passes through the eco-sensitive zone (ESZ) of the Silent Valley National Park and areas with high biodiversity along the Western Ghats. The Chief Wildlife Warden has recommended wildlife clearance with a ₹88.8 crore mitigation plan addressing elephant movement and biodiversity conservation.

The project involves the displacement of families residing on forest land. Site inspections revealed 4 houses in Olavakkode Range, and additional areas under litigation. Recommendations from the Special Government Pleader (Forests) suggest that diversion should proceed only after final court verdicts, highlighting concerns about unresolved legal disputes.

The user agency, the National Highways Authority of India (NHAI), has identified 9.53 hectares of non-forest land for Compensatory Afforestation in Wayanad Wildlife Sanctuary. However, site inspections deemed the land unsuitable for plantation. As a result, 19.06 hectares of degraded forest land in Nemmara Division have been proposed for afforestation, requiring ₹1.81 crore. 

The project's proximity to the Silent Valley National Park has necessitated wildlife clearance under the National Board for Wildlife (NBWL). The clearance proposal, submitted in October 2022, remains pending. Additionally, litigation involving approximately 3.67 hectares of the proposed land has delayed final approvals. The project has provision for wildlife overpass involving an area of 0.0925 hectare of land.

The REC approved for the project subject to certain conditions including preparation of muck disposal plan for implementation by the User Agency, NHAI. As per the EIA clearance, total number of trees to be cut for the proposed NH 966 project is 57,894, which includes 55,514 trees from non-forest areas and 2,380 trees from vested reserved forests. Watch our report on Environmental Clearance of the project

14 December 2024 YouTube X LinkedIn

The Meghalaya Power Generation Corporation Limited (MPGCL) is seeking Environmental Clearance (EC) for Myntdu Leshka Hydro Electric Project Stage-II (3X70) MW in an area of 85.229 Ha located at Village Bataw, Amtra, Satpator, Kharkhana and Tarangblang, in East Jaintia Hills and West Jaintia Hills Districts of Meghalaya. It is stated that the MPGCL has planned for a Run-of-the-river for hydropower development of the river Myntdu. The project scheme comprises a concrete gravity Dam that diverts the water into intake placed on the right bank of the river. The diverted water is planned to be passed through an underground water conductor system comprising the pressure shaft. A surface powerhouse is proposed on the right bank of the river. Tailwater from the powerhouse will be discharged back into the Myntdu river. The project would generate an annual energy generation of 605.64 MU in a 90% dependable year. A 46.0 m high concrete gravity dam across the River Myntdu is said to be proposed. The estimated project cost is Rs 3595.15 crore. 

The proposal was considered in the 19th meeting of the Expert Appraisal Committee constituted by the Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change (MoEF&CC) for appraisal of River Valley and Hydroelectric Projects. The meeting was held 30th November 2024 under the Chairmanship of Prof. Govinda Joseph Chakrapani. 

The project requires diversion of 11.349 hectares of Forest Land to meet the land requirement, besides 73.88 ha non-forest Land. It is stated that Total 5 villages shall be affected due to acquisition of land for various components of proposed project. Total 122 project affected families have been identified; all these 122 families will be losing land only. Further, all the land from Surge Shaft upto Power House Switch Yard, including proposed roads, are agricultural land where the main crops are Betel nut, betel leaf, broomstick, orange trees, etc. All these assets will have to be compensated for as well. The actual rate for crops will be assessed by the Agriculture and Horticulture Department, once commencement of works for the Project has started. 

The estimated quantity of Muck to be generated is declared as 815130 Cubic Meter. Total Muck Disposal Area stated as 4.40 ha. Distance of muck disposal area is stated as to be at about 600 m more than 30 m from HFL. It is further stated that the generated muck will be carried in dumper trucks covered with heavy-duty tarpaulin properly tied to the vehicle in line with international best practices. All precautionary measures will be followed during the dumping of muck. Based upon the varying cycle time of 20T Rear Dumpers at different excavation sites and their distance from the disposal site appropriate pollution management will be devised. 

The baseline noise level data in the core area of the project that falls under residential zone is said to be in the range of 47.3 dB(A) to 53. 8 dB(A) in the daytime and 35.32 dB(A) to 40.5 dB(A) in the nighttime. However, the EAC document does not declare any incremental level in the post-project operational phase.   

In the Public Hearing, stakeholders from East Jaintia Hills District raised various concerns and suggestions regarding the proposed project, focusing on infrastructure development, environmental protection, and community welfare. Key demands included road connectivity, electricity infrastructure like substations, and local employment prioritization over tendering systems. Several villages requested inclusion in the Local Area Development Plan and Disaster Management Plan, with proposals to build schools, healthcare facilities, and retaining walls to protect agricultural land from floods. Environmental concerns highlighted included maintaining adequate river flow to prevent droughts, addressing flood risks, and mitigating impacts on sand mining and fishing livelihoods. Additionally, villagers emphasized the importance of fair compensation for landowners and businesses, ensuring development projects are implemented before construction begins, as per the RFCT-LARR Act, 2013.

In West Jaintia Hills District, stakeholders expressed conditional support for the project, contingent on honoring agreements and prioritizing local development. Concerns included pollution from earlier project phases, risks to ferry services and agriculture from fluctuating water levels, and the need for afforestation within affected districts. Proposals for community infrastructure, such as schools, health centers, and community halls, were made, along with demands for relocation of the power house to reduce proximity to Kharkhana village. Many stakeholders urged the inclusion of their villages in project planning, highlighting the importance of addressing impacts on agricultural livelihoods and maintaining cultural activities like river festivals. The User Agency committed to measures like controlled water release, afforestation, and employment opportunities, aiming to address these concerns while adhering to environmental and land acquisition laws.

The EAC, after detailed deliberations, deferred the proposal due to the need for more information. It has asked the MPGCL to submit a copy of the Techno-Economic Clearances (TEC) of the Detailed Project Report (DPR). MPGCL has also been asked to submit a detailed action plan addressing the source of acidity in the water, including measures to treat the acidic water in the rivulets. Additionally, MPGCL should provide a plan to supply potable water for drinking purposes to the nearby communities. It is noted that adding lime may not resolve the large-scale acidity issue. A thorough investigation of the source of the acidity is required, along with the development of a comprehensive mitigation plan. MPGCL has also been directed to consider all potential impacts of other projects in the basin and to conduct a cumulative impact assessment. Furthermore, the Committee has requested that a study be conducted in consultation with CIFRI to assess fish migratory pathways, with special focus on mapping the Hilsa migration habitat and the population/stock during the rainy season to protect these critical habitat zones. The Committee has also required that MPGCL prepare a comparative chart of baseline data from 2020 and 2024 for further analysis.

The EAC also deliberated on the application submitted by Sikkim Urja Limited seeking an amendment to the EC for the Teesta Hydroelectric Project Stage-III (1200 MW), covering an area of 213.8831 hectares in Sikkim. The committee noted that the original EC was issued by the MoEF&CC on 4th August 2006. An amendment to the EC was granted on 30th April 2010 to accommodate design changes, and the transfer of EC from "Teesta Urja Limited" to "Sikkim Urja Limited" was approved on 16th November 2024. The EAC observed that the project, which became operational in February 2017, had functioned successfully until it was impacted by a flash flood on 3rd–4th October 2023. The flood caused extensive damage, including the washing away of the dam and severe flooding of the underground powerhouse, resulting in a complete halt in operations. The project proponent (PP) has now proposed replacing the previously planned Concrete Faced Rockfill Dam (CFRD) with a Concrete Gravity Dam while maintaining the original parameters, such as location, dam top elevation, full reservoir level, and auxiliary components. A significant proposed enhancement is the increase in spillway capacity from 7,000 cumecs to 19,946 cumecs to account for both Glacial Lake Outburst Floods (GLOF) and Probable Maximum Floods (PMF), unlike the earlier design, which considered only PMF. This modification aims to improve the dam's safety and resilience against extreme hydrological events. The PP assured the EAC that most project components, apart from the dam, could be restored within one year.

The EAC expressed serious concerns about the proposed dam's design, stability, and ability to withstand future natural disasters, given the region's susceptibility to extreme hydrological events. The committee recommended obtaining comments from the Central Electricity Authority (CEA) on the proposed modifications. It also suggested conducting a site visit by a sub-committee of EAC members before making any recommendations.

10 December 2024 YouTube X LinkedIn

At the recent 4th edition of the ‘FICCI Sustainable Agriculture Summit & Awards,’ Franklin L. Khobung, Joint Secretary at the Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare, Government of India, emphasized the crucial role of sustainable agriculture in ensuring India’s food and nutritional security. He highlighted that agriculture is not only a key driver of the nation's economic growth, contributing 18% to the GDP and employing 54% of the workforce in agriculture and allied sectors, but is also fundamental to India’s overall development. In light of this, the conversion of 38% and 94% of project land from agricultural use raises serious concerns, underscoring the need to balance development with the preservation of India’s agricultural security. 

The Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change (MoEF&CC) has published the minutes of the 18th meeting of the Expert Appraisal Committee (EAC) for the Coal Mining Sector, held on 27th November 2024. The document reveals the approval granted by the EAC for the Environmental Clearance (EC) of the Bhivkund Coal Mine project, proposed by Sunflag Iron & Steel Company Ltd., located in the villages of Ballarpur, Nandagaon Pode, and Visapur in Maharashtra’s Chandrapur District. The project, covering an area of 802 hectares with a capacity of 0.72 MTPA (normative) and 1.08 MTPA (peak), lies merely 0.03 km from the boundary of the critically polluted MIDC Ballarpur area. Despite this proximity, the approval proceeds amidst growing concerns over the deteriorating air quality in the region. The EIA report has highlighted PM2.5 levels ranging from 20 to 47 μg/m³ and PM10 levels between 43.4 to 88.2 μg/m³ during two monitoring periods in late 2022 and early 2023. This data aligns with the Central Pollution Control Board’s (CPCB) Air Quality Index, which has repeatedly flagged Chandrapur’s air quality as severely impacted by particulate matter.

Despite the project not involving forest land, the EIA reveals that 93.9% of the project area is agricultural land, raising concerns about the irreversible loss of farmland in a region heavily reliant on agriculture. The public hearing conducted in April 2024 highlighted widespread opposition, with only a fraction of attendees and written representations supporting the project. Critical concerns raised during the hearing included the depletion of the water table, the provision of potable water, environmental pollution, and the potential harm to wildlife, including the presence of bears, tigers, and deer in the area. The company’s responses to these concerns were largely generic, failing to address the depth of opposition or propose substantive mitigation measures. Additionally, the company has committed to deploying a fraction of electric or CNG/LNG-based trucks for coal transportation, yet no robust scientific evidence was presented to support the efficacy of this commitment in reducing air pollution.

The EAC also discussed on Chandragupt Opencast Coal Mine project proposed by Central Coalfields Limited in Jharkhand, Andhra Pradesh Mineral Development Corporation (APMDC) for the expansion of its coal mining operations in Singrauli, Madhya Pradesh and the Amelia Coal Mine Project, proposed by THDC India Limited in Singrauli, Madhya Pradesh. For more details Watch on YouTube

Further detailed report on Public Hearing and EC appraisal available as paid contents. 

25 November 2024 YouTube X LinkedIn

The Expert Appraisal Committee (EAC) has withdrawn its prior recommendation to grant Environmental Clearance (EC) for the Rolling Mill Division of Viraj Steel & Energy Private Limited, located in Sambalpur, Odisha. The decision was made during the 68th EAC meeting (Industry-I sector) held on 5th-6th November 2024, following a series of technical examinations and discrepancies in the project’s submissions.

Background

The company operates an existing Rolling Mill with a capacity of 3,00,000 tonnes per annum (TPA) at Gurupalli, Lapanga, Rengali Tehsil, Sambalpur. Initially, the project was recommended for EC under the Ministry of Environment, Forest, and Climate Change's (MoEF&CC) notification dated 20th July 2022, which pertains to standalone re-rolling mills. However, subsequent evaluations revealed ambiguities in the proposal and the project's alignment with the criteria for standalone rolling mills.

Key Findings

1. Discrepancies in Standalone Classification:

   • The Ministry’s guidelines specify that standalone rolling mills must feature a reheating furnace to independently process raw materials. Viraj Steel's facility lacks this furnace but depends on hot billets supplied directly from an integrated steel plant (ISP).

   • The EAC noted that the absence of a reheating furnace disqualifies the project from being considered a standalone unit under the notification.

2. Ambiguous Submissions:

   • During a personal hearing on 4th September 2024, the company acknowledged the lack of a reheating furnace and proposed its installation after receiving EC. This critical detail was omitted in earlier appraisals.

   • The EAC also discovered inconsistencies between previous and current proposals, raising concerns about incomplete and ambiguous disclosures.

3. Technical Misalignment:

   • The company argued that the rolling mill is a separate entity, supported by documents such as a separate GST number, a distinct land parcel, and agreements for raw material supply from Tata Steel. Despite this, the Ministry's technical analysis concluded that the facility functions as part of an integrated steel plant.

4. Recommendations and Decision:

   • The EAC emphasized the need for project proponents (PPs) to submit complete and accurate information. It recommended that both Viraj Steel & Energy Private Limited and its EIA consultant Kalyani Laboratories Pvt. Ltd. be cautioned for the unprofessional handling of the proposal.

   • Based on these findings, the EAC withdrew its previous recommendation for EC and advised that any future proposal should include authenticated data from the Odisha State Pollution Control Board (SPCB).

22 November 2024 YouTube X LinkedIn

The Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change (MoEF&CC) recently released the minutes of the 35th meeting of the Expert Appraisal Committee (EAC) for Non-Coal Mining Sector projects, which took place from 28th to 29th October 2024. Chaired by Dr. Dinesh Misra, IFS (Retd.), the meeting evaluated several mining proposals, including JSW Steel's expansion plan for the Narayanposhi Iron and Manganese Ore Mining Project in Sundargarh, Odisha.

People ask, Which state has Narayanposhi iron ore mines? The answer is Odisha.

A The EAC's documents states that JSW Steel secured the renewal of the No Objection Certificate (NOC) from the Central Ground Water Authority (CGWA) for groundwater withdrawal. NOC renewal was given on 17th October 2024, which is valid until January 2026. However, no such supporting document has been placed on PARIVESH portal. 

Notably, JSW Steel applied for the NOC renewal on 9th March 2024, after 781 days of the NOC expired on 19th January 2022. The EAC did not address whether the company had a valid NOC during this gap, compliance status, applicability of environmental compensation, raising questions about the project's compliance with groundwater regulations. This lack of clarity and action by the EAC undermines the integrity of the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) clearance process, highlighting a significant gap in regulatory scrutiny for mining projects. 

Which city is famous for iron ore? The answer is not Narayanposhi iron ore mines. Dalli and Rajhara in Durg are among the important iron ore mines in the country. In Karnataka, significant iron ore deposits are found in the Sandur-Hospet area of Ballari district, the Baba Budan hills and Kudremukh in Chikkamagaluru district, as well as parts of Shivamogga, Chitradurga, and Tumakuru districts.

16 November 2024 YouTube X LinkedIn

Core Green Sugars and Fuels Pvt. Ltd. (CGSFPL) has established an integrated sugar complex, which includes a 5000 TCD sugar plant, a 24 MW Co-generation Power Plant, and a 50 KLPD distillery at Tumkuru, Yadgir District, Karnataka. The initial Environmental Clearance (EC) was granted on 18th July 2008, covering a total land area of 151 Ha. The proposed amendment relates to the project's development and a significant land transfer issue.

Key Findings:

Land Utilization and Green Belt Development

• Green Belt Requirement: The EC granted in 2008 mandated a 33% green belt on the total industrial plot area, equating to 54 Ha. However, CGSFPL utilized only 93.65 Ha of the 151 Ha for industrial purposes, leaving 57.35 Ha as agricultural land, contrary to the intended use for green belt development. This agricultural land was transferred to Core Green Bioscience Pvt. Ltd. in May 2023.

• Impact of Land Transfer: The transfer of 57.35 Ha to the sister company raises concerns about the legitimacy and environmental impact of this land-use change. The amendment requests reflect this transfer, but questions remain about whether the land should have been used for the green belt as originally intended.

Green Belt Development and Delays

• Despite the 2008 EC requirement, CGSFPL failed to establish the green belt within the stipulated timeframe. The green belt development was delayed until 2024, with a revised action plan proposing the planting of 72,655 trees by March 2025. The EAC has emphasized the importance of completing this plan on time to fulfill environmental obligations.

• Initially, non-indigenous species were proposed for planting in the green belt, but these were revised following concerns raised by the EAC. The action plan has now been adjusted to focus on more environmentally appropriate species.

• Timeline for Green Belt Development: The revised plan includes planting trees in phases from November 2024 to March 2025.

Land Transfer and Compliance Concerns

• The land transfer issue remains a critical point of discussion. The original EC required the entire 151 Ha of land, including the green belt area. However, the transfer of 57.35 Ha of agricultural land to Core Green Bioscience Pvt. Ltd. in 2023 raises concerns about compliance with environmental regulations.

• The EAC has reviewed the situation and called for the IA-Policy Division's opinion on the matter. The outcome of this review will be crucial in determining the legitimacy of the land transfer.

Non-Compliance and Delays

• Non-compliance with EC Conditions: The delay in green belt development highlights a significant failure to comply with the environmental conditions set in 2008. The delay spans 16 years, with the green belt still not fully developed as of 2024.

• This delay raises questions about the company’s commitment to sustainable development and adherence to environmental norms. The ongoing non-compliance is a critical issue that must be addressed to ensure the project's overall environmental impact is mitigated.

Key Issues for Review:

1. Delayed Green Belt Development: The project’s failure to meet the green belt development requirement in the timeline specified in the EC raises serious concerns. The proposed action plan to rectify this issue remains under scrutiny, as delays could lead to further non-compliance.

2. Land Transfer Controversy: The land transfer of 57.35 Ha to a sister company, Core Green Bioscience Pvt. Ltd., is another area of concern. The transfer could circumvent the original EC conditions, which require this land to be part of the industrial project, particularly for the green belt. The IA-Policy Division must thoroughly review the legal and environmental implications of this transfer.

3. Revised Green Belt Action Plan: Although the revised green belt action plan appears to address earlier concerns, including the use of indigenous species, its implementation must be closely monitored. The successful completion of the plan is essential to meet environmental commitments and mitigate project impacts.

4. EC Amendment Process: The EC amendment is subject to the approval of the Ministry of Environment, Forest, and Climate Change (MoEFCC). The approval will hinge on the resolution of the land transfer issue, which needs further scrutiny. Additionally, the company must adhere to all conditions related to the green belt and other environmental safeguards.

Conclusion:

The amendment to the EC for the integrated sugar complex by Core Green Sugars and Fuels Pvt. Ltd. reveals ongoing non-compliance with the 2008 EC conditions, particularly concerning the green belt. The land transfer issue further complicates the situation and requires in-depth examination by the IA-Policy Division to ensure that it does not undermine environmental safeguards.

The prolonged non-compliance also questions effectiveness of monitoring policy of the Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change.

The revised green belt action plan offers a potential resolution, but it must be closely monitored to ensure its full implementation within the specified timeline. Given the substantial delays and unresolved compliance issues, approval of the amendment should only be granted after the land transfer issue is satisfactorily addressed and environmental norms are fully adhered to.

16 November 2024 YouTube X LinkedIn

The Expert Appraisal Committee (EAC) under the Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change recently evaluated proposals under the Industry 2 sector category seeking Environmental Clearance (EC). According to its document EC/MOM/EAC/290231/10/2024 dated 11th November 2024, VINP Distilleries and Sugars Pvt. Ltd. (Unit-II) has sought Environmental Clearance (EC) for establishing a 10,000 TCD sugar plant, an 800 KLPD multi-feed distillery unit (using cane syrup, molasses, or grain), and a 42 MW co-generation unit in Tabakada Honnalli Village, Kalaghatagi Taluk, Dharwad District, Karnataka.

A public hearing was conducted on 11th October 2023 as part of the process. Public hearings are participatory platforms where local communities, stakeholders, and project proponents engage in discussions about proposed developmental projects. They allow affected individuals to voice concerns, offer suggestions, and seek clarifications about potential environmental and social impacts. These hearings are crucial for ensuring transparency, accountability, and inclusivity in decision-making, enabling authorities to incorporate public feedback into project designs while aligning development with environmental sustainability and community welfare.

Sahadevappa Siddappa Nulavi from Tabakada Honnahalli Village emphasized the necessity of effective pollution control measures to prevent water and air pollution, ensuring environmental safety. Similarly, Rudragouda P. Patil, also from Tabakada Honnahalli, raised concerns about the Attiveri Bird Sanctuary’s proximity to the project site, urging the company to adopt stringent measures to protect the sanctuary and prevent harm to birds. Supporting this sentiment, Gandhi Basappa Thammannavara, a Gram Panchayat member from the same village, stressed the need to safeguard the public, birds, and animals from air pollution while addressing farmers' concerns.

Chandrasekhar Mahadevappa Karadikoppa, President of Taluk Ahind, voiced support for the project but highlighted critical conditions. These included preventing solid waste and wastewater from contaminating nearby lakes and water bodies, ensuring no harm to the environment or agricultural land. Similar views were echoed by (Bangari) from Tabakada Honnahalli Village and former Zilla Panchayat member C.F. Patil, who reiterated the importance of the industry operating without causing environmental damage.

Nijaguni Kelageri of the District Sugarcane Growers Association, Dharwad, also supported the project on the condition that it adheres to strict environmental safeguards, ensuring no harm to agriculture or the environment from waste disposal. He further called for higher prices for sugarcane from Kalaghatagi Taluk, citing its high yield and recovery. Additionally, he urged measures to prevent dust deposition on crops. Environmentalist B.V. Reddy from Bellary suggested increasing the greenbelt beyond the CPCB's 33% recommendation and called for investments in local healthcare and education.

Environmental activists such as Manjula from the Gynan Kendra Vidya Institution in Chitradurga and Shankaranna Thippannavara, President of Kalaghathi Raith Sanga, emphasized the importance of public and worker safety and the need to avoid adverse effects on wildlife and the environment. D. Somashekara of the Seva Adventure Club recommended greenbelt expansion near schools and villages, while G. Sathyanarayana Reddy of the Pragathi Integrated Evergreen Welfare Society called for adherence to CPCB and CREP guidelines.

Additional recommendations came from individuals like C.S. Rangamma of Akshara Grameena Vikas Samsthe, who suggested planting medicinal trees and adopting noise pollution controls. D. Govardhan of Titans Organisation, Malathi J. of the Mother Teresa Education & Charitable Trust, and S. Ravindra of the Sarvodaya Integrated Rural Environment Development Organization supported greenbelt development initiatives. Manjula from the G.K. Education and Rural Urban Development Society advocated for implementing rainwater harvesting systems, while B. Venkatesh of Haritha Educational Rural Welfare Society highlighted the need for air pollution mitigation and welfare initiatives for locals.

The public consultation revealed an environmentally aware, conscious public participated in the EIA process, and emphasized the need to balance industrial development with ecological conservation, underscoring the importance of strict adherence to environmental norms and sustainable practices.

The project site is home to a total of 2,124 trees, divided into 960 retainable trees and 1,164 removable trees. Of these removable trees, 1,118 are Mango trees (Mangifera indica), with the remainder including Nilagiri (23), Sapota (11), Subabul (4), and Coconut (1), amounting to a total of 1,157 trees. These trees have been exempted from removal by the Karnataka Forest Department (Territorial Range, Kalaghatagi), as per a clarification letter uploaded on the PARIVESH portal. However, approval for the removal of seven other trees—Bilwapatre (1), Neem (5), and Nelli (1)—still needs to be obtained from the Karnataka Forest Department.

This information, however, was not discussed during the public hearing, raising concerns about whether it was properly communicated to the public. Furthermore, the presence of spelling errors and incomplete sentences in the EAC document casts doubt on the accuracy and completeness of the information presented, suggesting the possibility of modifications to the public hearing data and official documents. Additionally, the EAC’s casual mention of the 2,124 trees existing at the plant premises and their assertion that only 1,157 non-retainable trees will be cut, subject to the necessary approvals under the Karnataka Preservation of Trees Act, 1976, and other applicable laws, reflects a lack of careful consideration. This raises concerns regarding the transparency and due diligence applied in documenting and communicating the environmental impact of the project.

12 November 2024 YouTube X LinkedIn

Ind-Barath Energy (Utkal) Ltd. (IBEUL), a subsidiary of JSW Energy Ltd., has secured approval of the Expert Appraisal Committee for grant of environmental clearance for the expansion of its coal-based thermal power plant located in the village of Sahajbahal, Lakhanpur Tehsil, Jharsuguda District. The project, which currently operates a 1x350 MW unit, is set to double its capacity with an additional 350 MW unit, as permitted under the guidelines of S.O. 1246(E) dated 18th March 2021. This clearance was granted despite concerns surrounding environmental pollution and nearby community impacts.

The power facility has not yet incorporated Flue Gas Desulphurization (FGD) as mandated by a MoEF&CC notification dated 5th September 2022. The company has planned to complete the FGD installation, which is critical to control sulfur dioxide (SO₂) emissions, by 2026. The project continues to draw attention due to its proximity to significant water bodies and communities. Located only 0.65 kilometers west of the Hirakud Reservoir’s backwater area, which is stated to have a high flood level (HFL) of 632 meters, and 2.39 kilometers east of the IB River, the site’s placement has raised environmental and safety concerns among local stakeholders.

Since Unit 1 of the plant began operations in January 2024, the project has generated significant quantities of fly ash and bottom ash, by-products of coal combustion with potential environmental risks if not managed responsibly. Data provided by the EAC reveal that in the past three years alone, the plant produced 73,186 MT of fly ash, of which 91% was disposed of across various sites, including low-lying areas, abandoned mines, stone quarries, and road construction projects. According to the Odisha State Pollution Control Board (OSPCB), this disposal activity was conducted with state authorization granted on 23rd July 2024. Bottom ash disposal has been similarly handled, with 44% of the 18,297 MT generated over the last three years used in identical applications; however, there remains a lack of transparency regarding the disposal or utilization of the remaining bottom ash.

Although the company presented a 100% ash utilization plan as part of its environmental action plan, the strategy notably falls short, with only 30% of the ash allocated for use in the production of cement and bricks, raising questions on the efficacy and environmental impact of the remainder. Local environmental advocates have expressed concerns over these figures, pointing to gaps in comprehensive utilization and potential long-term impacts on land and water bodies near the project.

A further area of contention lies in the historical violation of forest land laws. The original developers of the project, Ind-Barath Energy (Utkal) Ltd., reportedly encroached upon 35.98 hectares of forested land, a situation which has now been "regularized." However, this history has increased scrutiny on the project’s expansion, as the region’s biodiversity and water resources may face increased stress under intensified industrial activity.

From a pollution standpoint, the expanded plant is estimated to produce 2,700 tonnes per day (TPD) of particulate matter (PM), along with 30 TPD of sulfur emissions as sulfur dioxide (SO₂) and 51 TPD of nitrogen oxides (NOₓ), which collectively contribute to air quality concerns for the surrounding areas. The predicted ground-level concentrations (GLCs) from the plant’s operation are estimated at 2.92 micrograms per cubic meter (µg/m³) for PM, 0.47 µg/m³ for SO₂, and 0.90 µg/m³ for NOₓ. Although these figures are within permissible limits, there is particular concern for the nearby Balijangha Primary School, which lies directly in the plant’s crosswind direction. The project’s Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) consultant has asserted that there will be “negligible impact” on the school; however, local environmental groups and community members have voiced skepticism, highlighting potential health risks for children and faculty members exposed to airborne pollutants over extended periods.

The plant has committed to a zero-liquid discharge (ZLD) system, meaning that no effluents are to be released into the Hirakud backwater reservoir or any other water body. This commitment, if rigorously implemented, will limit the plant’s impact on local water resources, though continued monitoring will be crucial to ensure compliance.

The EAC’s recommendation for environmental clearance has generated a divided response, with some stakeholders welcoming the economic benefits and energy generation potential, while environmentalists and nearby residents call for stringent oversight and enhanced pollution control measures. The expansion of the plant, set to nearly double its output, underscores the persistent challenge of balancing India’s energy needs with the imperative to protect vulnerable communities and ecosystems from industrial pollution.

5 November 2024 YouTube X LinkedIn

The Expert Appraisal Committee (Infra-2), in its 132nd meeting, deliberated on the application by Bengaluru International Airport Limited (BIAL) for an extension of the validity of its Environmental Clearance (EC). This EC pertains to the ongoing second-stage expansion at Bengaluru International Airport in Devanahalli, Bengaluru Rural District. The project is categorized under item 7(i) “Airports” in the Schedule to the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Notification, 2006, which mandates environmental appraisal at the central level.

The original EC, granted on 22nd August 2014, authorized BIAL to expand the airport’s capacity from 17.2 million passengers per annum (MPPA) to 55 MPPA. Subsequent amendments to the clearance were issued in December 2018 and February 2021. Due to COVID-19-related delays in construction timelines, the Ministry extended the EC validity period to 21st August 2025 under a January 2021 exemption that allows for time extensions without penalizing delayed activities during the pandemic.

The airport project spans 1,622 hectares and is designated for traffic transportation in the Bengaluru International Airport Area Planning Authority (BIAAPA) Master Plan. Its operational infrastructure includes systems for sustainable water and energy management, solid waste processing, and rainwater harvesting. The airport currently receives 9 million liters per day (MLD) of water from the Bangalore Water Supply and Sewerage Board (BWSSB), with wastewater treated in a 5 MLD Sewage Treatment Plant (STP) for non-potable reuse.

The area within a 10-kilometer radius around Bengaluru International Airport exhibits diverse land uses, with agricultural zones occupying 38% of the area (19,025 hectares). Built-up settlements account for 4% (2,025 hectares), while forested areas comprise 4.9% (2,463 hectares). Additionally, water bodies, including streams, rivers, tanks, and reservoirs, make up 4.9% (2,469 hectares), enhancing the ecological landscape around the airport. Industrial and institutional areas cover 3.1% (1,545 hectares), balancing infrastructure needs with natural landscapes.

The airport incorporates green infrastructure, including rooftop rainwater harvesting systems with a 1.7 MLD reservoir in Terminal 1 and six rainwater harvesting ponds with a combined capacity of 700 million liters (ML). In 2023, solar installations at the airport generated 9.3 million kWh of energy, with additional renewable energy purchases bolstering the airport's sustainable operations.

For waste and emissions management, BIAL generates approximately 20 tons of solid waste daily, managed through an integrated waste management facility with a capacity of 70 tons, aligned with the "Swachh Bharat Mission" for clean and sustainable waste handling. Used oil from operations, estimated at 28,350 liters daily, is responsibly disposed of through certified recyclers.

In reviewing the extension application, the Expert Appraisal Committee (EAC) confirmed that the project’s validity aligns with the amended EIA Notification guidelines, extending expiration to 21st August 2025 due to COVID-related delays. However, the EAC noted a lack of specific documentation detailing the scope of remaining work and the completion status of previously approved activities.

The EAC advised BIAL to reapply for the extension three months prior to the EC expiry, including a detailed breakdown of pending construction versus completed milestones. Consequently, the EAC returned the proposal in its current form, requesting further information.

1 November 2024 YouTube X LinkedIn

In a pivotal decision for the Chatti Bariatu (CB) Coal Mining Project, the Expert Appraisal Committee (EAC) of the Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change has approved amendments to three conditions of the Environmental Clearance (EC) initially granted on 19th April 2010, with subsequent amendments on 5th January 2024. Managed by NTPC Mining Limited, this project covers an extensive area of 646.23 hectares and has a production capacity of 7 million tonnes per annum (MTPA), situated in the Hazaribagh district, including the villages of Chatti Bariatu, Pagar, and Jordag.

NTPC has attributed the need for these amendments primarily to delays in the construction of the coal transportation conveyor system. They indicated that even if the conveyor system is completed, operations would remain halted until the necessary railway connections are established. Alarmingly, the EAC has revealed that NTPC has not fully complied with seven existing conditions of the original EC, and notably, has completely ignored one critical condition regarding the implementation of the Wildlife Conservation Plan and Site-Specific Wildlife Management Plan for over 14 years.

Compliance Issues and Wildlife Conservation Plan

The responsibility for executing the Wildlife Conservation Plan has been delegated to the State Forest Department, with NTPC instructed to provide regular progress updates to the Regional Office (RO). A recent report from the Divisional Forest Officer (DFO) of Hazaribagh West Forest Division has raised concerns about the lack of officially recognized elephant corridors in the area, despite recorded elephant sightings over the past five years, particularly in the Barkagaon range. This situation highlights the urgent need for effective wildlife management practices to mitigate potential human-wildlife conflicts arising from coal transportation activities.

Amendments to Transportation Protocols

One of the key changes approved by the EAC pertains to transportation protocols for coal from the coal handling plant (CHP) to the railway sidings. The original EC mandated that coal transport be conducted exclusively through closed conveyor systems, thereby prohibiting road transportation. However, the recent amendments allow NTPC to utilize covered tippers and dumpers for coal transport to designated railway sidings until 31st March 2027. This new provision covers multiple routes, including Shivpur, Bachra, Katkamsandi, Kusmahi, Biratoli, and Tori Sidings, with distances ranging from 26 km to 96 km.

The EAC has emphasized that while road transport is permissible until 30th June 2025, all coal must be transported via rail to the Barh Super Thermal Power Station (STPP) thereafter. The completion of the conveyor belt system is mandated by the same deadline, after which the project is expected to revert to the original transportation methods.

Operational Measures and Environmental Oversight

In addition to the transportation changes, the Committee has outlined several compliance measures aimed at enhancing environmental oversight. NTPC is tasked with addressing various non-conformities highlighted by the Regional Office, including implementing a plantation plan with a budget of ₹12.78 crores, which remains unexecuted. The construction of the closed conveyor system is ongoing, with a commitment to completion by 30th June 2025.

Furthermore, the timeline for establishing the company's railway siding has been extended, requiring NTPC to begin using the JCRL railway siding by July 2025. Key operational milestones also include the installation of an Effluent Treatment Plant (ETP) by 31st October 2024, supported by a financial allocation of ₹27.93 lakhs, and the full implementation of the Resettlement and Rehabilitation (R&R) plan, with a substantial budget of ₹882 crores earmarked for this purpose.

The EAC has mandated continuous monitoring of ambient air quality and noise levels along coal transportation routes, requiring biannual reports to the Regional Office. Specific operational restrictions have been implemented, including limiting coal transport through village roads to nighttime hours, from 9 PM to 7 AM, and prohibiting vehicles older than four years from being used in coal transportation.

Challenges to Sustainable Development

While the recent amendments to the Environmental Clearance for the Chatti Bariatu Coal Mining Project illustrate a complex relationship between developmental needs and environmental protection, they also raise pressing questions regarding the sustainability of such initiatives. The recommendations made by the EAC aim to facilitate operational flexibility while ensuring compliance with environmental regulations. However, despite NTPC’s stated commitment to cleaner energy and adherence to environmental stewardship, the repeated instances of non-compliance cast doubt on the effectiveness of these policies.

NTPC's five-page Environment Policy Document asserts the company’s commitment “to provide cleaner energy by committing to the highest possible levels of performance in environmental compliance, practices, and stewardship.” Furthermore, NTPC's Biodiversity Policy, established in 2018, emphasizes the importance of protecting biodiversity within their operational frameworks. However, the ongoing non-compliance issues signal significant gaps in accountability and enforcement, highlighting the need for stronger regulatory oversight.

As NTPC Mining Limited adjusts to the newly imposed conditions, the emphasis will remain on responsible coal mining practices that prioritize environmental sustainability and community welfare. The EAC’s recommendation for a site visit by a sub-committee underscores the importance of direct assessments to ensure adherence to the stipulated conditions. The real challenge lies in bridging the gap between policy commitments and actual practices on the ground, ultimately determining the future trajectory of sustainable development in the region. As people are widely searching ntpc green energy ipo allotment, ntpc green energy ipo gmp allotment date, ipo allotment status, ntpc allotment status, ntpc green energy ipo allotment date, ntpc green energy ipo, ntpc green ipo allotment status, ntpc green listing date, ntpc green energy ipo allotment status - this article may be of significance.

19 October 2024 YouTube X LinkedIn

The Expert Appraisal Committee (EAC) of the Ministry of Environment, Forest, and Climate Change, responsible for appraising Coal Mining sector projects, and the environmental impact assessment agency deliberated on an application submitted by Sunflag Iron & Steel Company Ltd. during a meeting held on 8th October 2024. The company is seeking Environmental Clearance (EC) to establish a new Underground Coal Mine, covering an area of 802 hectares. The Bhivkund Coal Mine is located at Visapur, Nandgaonpode, and the urban area of Ballarpur, in Ballarpur Tehsil, District Chandrapur, Maharashtra. In the pre-mining land use, 753.46 hectares are agricultural land, while post-mining, this shrinks to 5.45 hectares of agricultural land. 

Min Mec Consultancy Private Limited is the environmental impact consultant that conducted environmental impact assessment mining project and environmental impact assessment report ppt including the assessment of environmental effects, eia and climate change.

A Public Hearing, sometimes unofficially called as public court hearing, was conducted on 24th April 2024, with 1,561 attendees, of which 1,012 supported the project, citing employment, growth, and development benefits for the area, while the remaining attendees opposed the project. The videography of the Public Hearing proceedings was reportedly not submitted to the EAC. Major concerns raised during the hearing included depletion of the water table, provision of potable water, control of environmental pollution, discharge of acidified mine water containing heavy metals, land acquisition, the presence of wildlife such as bears, tigers, and deer, and crop damage due to coal transportation.

The Committee deferred the proposal pending additional information, including a distance certificate from the Divisional Forest Officer (DFO) confirming that the Eco-Sensitive Zone of Tadoba Andhari Tiger Reserve is not located within 10 km of the project area. The budget for the Wildlife Conservation Plan must be increased to include the conservation of aquatic biodiversity in the Wardha River floodplains. The EAC also asked for a videography of the Public Hearing proceedings. The Environmental Management Plan (EMP) should be revised to incorporate mitigation measures in accordance with the Ministry's guidelines, considering the project's proximity to the critically polluted MIDC Ballarpur area. The EMP budget should include measures for the protection of the Wardha River and concurrent plantation. A time-bound action plan to reduce coal transportation by road is required, along with a safe passage plan for villagers in the vicinity of the mine infrastructure. Additionally, a comparative study on groundwater seepage and quality, including mercury and arsenic levels, must be submitted. Finally, an action plan for the installation of solar power in the mining lease area is needed.

16 October 2024 YouTube X LinkedIn

The State Environment Impact Assessment Authority (SEIAA), Gujarat, granted Environmental Clearance (EC) on 11th October 2024 for the proposed Employees’ State Insurance Corporation (ESIC) Hospital in Sanand, Ahmedabad. The hybrid meeting, chaired by H. K. Dash, SEIAA Chairperson, discussed the fresh EC proposal submitted by Hemant Pandey on behalf of ESIC, under the Ministry of Labour & Employment, Government of India.

The proposed hospital, titled "ESIC Hospital Building Project," falls under Category 8(a) of the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Notification, 2006. The project spans a plot area of 38,850 m², with an FSI area of 52,882.91 m² and a total built-up area of 87,315.11 m². It involves constructing a 500-bed hospital with one building consisting of two basements, a ground floor, and six upper floors. As the project meets the criteria of Category ‘B’ under the EIA Notification, 2006, public consultation is not required.

Following the State Expert Appraisal Committee (SEAC)’s recommendation on 8th October 2024, SEIAA granted the clearance with conditions regarding fire safety, waste management, parking facilities, and adherence to environmental standards. The approval emphasizes responsible construction practices and environmental sustainability.

The Environmental Clearance serves as a guideline for compliance with environmental laws and does not confer legal rights. The project proponents are mandated to submit half-yearly compliance reports via the Parivesh portal on 1st June and 1st December each year.

Notably, Amit Shah, Union Minister for Home Affairs & Cooperation, laid the foundation stone for the 350-bed (upgradable to 500 beds) ESIC Hospital in Sanand, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, on 26th September 2022. The hospital will feature OPD, indoor facilities, X-ray, radiology, laboratory, operation theater, obstetrics & gynecology services, ICU, ultrasound, and other modern amenities. Spread over 9.5 acres, the hospital’s construction was estimated to cost ₹500 crores, with plans to upgrade it to a 500-bed facility as needed. The hospital will serve 12 lakh employees and their families, as well as the villagers of Sanand, said the Home Minister. 

What is Sanand famous for? Sanand, often referred to as the car center point of Gujarat, has a rich history. Once a small royal state under the control of the Waghela family, Sanand was ruled by Maharaj Jaywant Singh Vaghela, who was also known for his deep involvement in music. Notably, in 1946, Maharaj Jaywant Singh Vaghela welcomed the renowned classical singer Pandit Jasraj, who was still very young at the time, and his family to Sanand, marking a significant cultural moment in the region's history. 

12 October 2024 YouTube X LinkedIn

The Expert Appraisal Committee (Infra-2) of the Ministry of Environment, Forest, and Climate Change recently deferred its decision on a proposal to develop Shree Jagannath International Airport in Sipasarubali, Puri District, Odisha. The proposed airport would cover 471.348 hectares and was submitted by the Odisha State Commerce and Transport Department. The committee also noted that approximately 60 families would be affected by the project and would require compensation for the acquisition of their agricultural land. 

The EAC decisions comes amidst Dusshera wishes, Dusshera 2024. As per the EAC document dated 10th October 2024, it has decided to depute a sub-committee to conduct a site visit to assess the ground situation for the proposed Shree Jagannath International Airport project in Sipasarubali, Puri District, Odisha. The committee has also requested additional information from the Odisha State Commerce and Transport Department, including the status of Stage I Forest Clearance, fugitive dust modeling and EMP revisions, NOx emission details and control measures during flight operation, a study of the impact on local and migratory birds, details of nearby wetlands and conservation measures, compliance with public hearing issues, details of connecting roads and traffic influx modeling, water transportation pipeline details, a copy of the Civil Aviation Ministry's approval, a passenger influx study, a rainwater harvesting plan, and a site-specific disaster management plan. 

During Public Hearing concerns raised on environment and forest includes the restoration of forest cover to maintain the ecological balance and mitigate cyclone impacts, compensatory afforestation plans, green belt restoration, protection of rare plant species, mitigation of temperature rise and tsunami risks, conservation of flora and fauna, wastewater management, and the impact on agricultural practices and livelihoods. 

10 October 2024 YouTube X LinkedIn

The Expert Appraisal Committee (EAC) for appraisal of Thermal Power Projects (TPPs) held its 13th meeting on 1st October 2024. Today, the Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change has released the 128 page EAC Minutes of Meeting. 

The EAC deliberated on proposal of Adani Power Limited, Raipur for expansion of the Raipur Thermal Power Plant by adding 1600 MW (2x800 MW) Ultra-Super Critical units to the existing capacity of 1370 MW (2x685 MW) and EC amendment proposal of Jindal Power Limited seeking use of existing ash dyke. To access detailed news report for members and subscribers click here.

8 October 2024 YouTube X LinkedIn

Meghalaya is one of the northeastern states of India. Why is Meghalaya famous for? Meghalaya, known as the Abode of Clouds, is home to some of the world's richest biodiversity. Famous for its monsoons, vibrant traditional festivals, and dramatic landscapes, the state offers a unique and captivating experience. During the Navaratra days, it's significant to answer "Which God is famous in Meghalaya?". The Nartiang Durga Temple, one of the 51 Shakti Peethas in India, is regarded by Hindus in the region as the permanent abode of Goddess Durga. 

Amid the common queries about tourist attractions in Meghalaya—such as the Meghalaya Portal, Meghalaya Tourism, Meghalaya Map, Meghalaya language, Meghalaya government recruitment, the history of Meghalaya, and MPSC Meghalaya—Enviro Annotations is reporting on the decisions made by the State Environment Impact Assessment Authority (SEIAA) in its meeting on 20th September 2024, which was released on 7th October 2024.

The SEIAA approved Environmental Clearance (EC) for Koksi Songma Stone Mine proposed by Premsons Promoters Pvt. Ltd.,Umsoo Mootang Limestone Mine (Block III), Sudap Bisik (Chiran Songma) Stone Mine, Manggapara Stone Mine and EC validity extension sought by Dalmia Cement Bharat Limited for Umsoo Mootang Limestone Mine (Block III). 

The SEIAA deferred the proposal of Ïaidlang Bamon seeking EC for Krem Shrieh Limestone Mine.

The SEIAA has mandated monitoring of heavy metals such as Mercury, Arsenic, Nickel, Cadmium and Chromium in the ambient air of core zone. Is Hg and Cd toxic? Notable that Mercury, Cadmium and Chromium are not listed in National Ambient Air Quality Standards 2009 published by the Government of India. However, this shows heavy metal pollutant parameters have significance in mining projects and environmental issues in Meghalaya. 

8 October 2024 YouTube X LinkedIn

The Ministry of Environment, Forest, and Climate Change has released the Minutes of the 86th meeting of the Expert Appraisal Committee (EAC) for the appraisal of Industrial Projects - 3. Who won? Rather, who passed through? Who failed?

The Minutes of Meeting (MoM) dated 7th October 2024 reveal that, during deliberations on the proposal by Technochem seeking Environmental Clearance (EC) for the expansion of synthetic organic chemicals, specifically Piperazine derivatives as key starting materials for API manufacturing in Phase I, Dombivli MIDC Industrial Estate, Dombivli (East), Thane District of Maharashtra, the EAC returned the application. The Committee noted that Technochem submitted a document issued by the Urban Development Department indicating the land use under the master plan instead of a declaration as an industrial area, which cannot be accepted as supporting evidence for obtaining exemption from the public hearing. The Committee suggested submitting a specific document indicating the notification or declaration of the industrial area by the Industry Department of the State Government. In the absence of such a document, the project will be treated as a Category 'A' project, requiring Technochem to conduct a public hearing for the proposed expansion.

Several projects were deferred for various reasons. However, many proposals were recommended for the grant of EC. Notably, the EC conditions regarding stack height appear inconsistent, with no clear explanation provided for the variations. For news report detailing who passed through and who failed SUBSCRIBE

26th Sept 2024 YouTube X LinkedIn

Greenstar Fertilizers Limited has submitted a proposal seeking clearance under the Coastal Regulation Zone (CRZ) Notification, 2011, for the storage of Linear Alkyl Benzene (LAB) and N-Paraffin at their existing storage terminal located at S.F.No.255/1 in the VOC Port Area, Mullakadu Village, Thoothukudi District. The proposal aims to replace the storage of Naphtha with LAB and N-Paraffin.

The CRZ division, through communication F.No.19-27/2018-IA.III, requested clarification from the Industry-2 division on whether the aforementioned chemicals—Linear Alkyl Benzene and N-Paraffin—fall under the category of petroleum products as stipulated in paragraph 8II (iv) of the CRZ Notification, 2011, which permits the receipt and storage of petroleum products in designated areas.

During the Expert Appraisal Committee (EAC) meeting, it was concluded that both Linear Alkyl Benzene and N-Paraffin are classified as petroleum products. As such, these chemicals fall within the scope of the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Notification, 2006. Consequently, the production and storage of these chemicals necessitate prior Environmental Clearance (EC) as per the regulatory framework.

Based on this assessment, it has been recommended that the CRZ division be informed that the proposed storage of LAB and N-Paraffin at the VOC Port Area requires compliance with EIA Notification, 2006, and prior EC is mandatory for the production of these substances.

26th Sept 2024 YouTube X LinkedIn

The Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change on Tuesday 24th September 2024 released the Minutes of meeting held by the Expert Appraisal Committee (EAC) for Industrial Projects - 2 (Industry-2). During the meeting held from 11th to 12th September 2024, the EAC returned the proposal submitted by Onkar Sakhar Karkhana Pvt. Ltd., seeking Environmental Clearance (EC) for the proposed expansion of its sugar unit from 2500 TCD to 4800 TCD, alongside a 150 KLPD multi-feed distillery plant and an 18 MW cogeneration facility at Ambulga, Taluka Nilanga, District Latur, Maharashtra. The decision followed the EAC's detailed review of the environmental impact assessment and public feedback concerning the expansion project.

During deliberations, the EAC raised several concerns and highlighted gaps in the environmental management plan proposed by the company. The key issues flagged by the EAC include:

• Closure Report of Existing Project: The EAC demanded that Onkar Sakhar Karkhana submit a closure report for the existing project from the concerned State Pollution Control Board (SPCB). This report is critical to ensure that all previous environmental obligations have been fulfilled.

• Reduction of Spent Wash Generation: The PP was instructed to submit an undertaking to reduce the volume of spent wash generated from the distillery process from the current 7.2 KL to 6 KL, highlighting a need for better waste management and environmental protection.

• Biodiversity Impact: The EAC stressed the importance of addressing biodiversity impacts in the project. It recommended that the PP develop a Biodiversity Management Plan, noting that the environmental impact assessment had not adequately considered this aspect.

• Switching to Advanced Air Pollution Control Equipment (APCE): The EAC asked the PP to replace the proposed wet scrubber with a more efficient Electrostatic Precipitator for controlling air pollution during operations.

• Justification for Boiler Installation: The committee raised concerns about the installation of a boiler during the project's expansion. The PP was required to provide a clear power and steam balance to justify the need for the boiler.

• Source of Bagasse: The EAC requested detailed information on the source of bagasse, a by-product used for cogeneration, emphasizing the need for transparency in the supply chain of raw materials.

• Wastewater Reuse: The PP was advised to utilize treated wastewater from the sugar unit in the distillery operations to minimize environmental impacts and ensure water conservation.

• Sludge Treatment Improvements: The PP was instructed to submit an undertaking to replace sludge drying beds with more advanced technologies, such as filter presses, to improve the efficiency and environmental safety of sludge treatment.

• Non-Indigenous Species in Greenbelt Development: The proposal included non-indigenous species in the greenbelt development plan, which the EAC rejected. The PP was directed to revise the plan to exclude non-native species and focus on indigenous flora.

• Public Hearing Action Plan: The PP was asked to submit an action plan addressing the concerns raised by the public during the hearing process, ensuring transparency and responsiveness to community feedback.

• Management of Ash from Incineration Boiler: The EAC also required the submission of a detailed action plan for managing ash generated from the incineration boiler used in the facility.

• Cane Crushing Season Justification: The PP had mentioned a cane crushing season of 220 days, which the EAC flagged for further justification, seeking clarity on how this timeframe aligns with the project’s operational sustainability.

Given these unresolved issues, the EAC decided to return the proposal in its present form. The company will need to address these concerns comprehensively before resubmitting the project for further consideration.

18th Sept 2024 YouTube X LinkedIn

EA brings you this report on TruAlt Bioenergy Reviews. The Expert Appraisal Committee (EAC) of the Ministry of Environment, Forest, and Climate Change (MoEF&CC), responsible for the evaluation of Industry-2 sector projects, has recently reviewed a site visit report concerning the expansion of TruAlt Bioenergy Limited's distillery in Bagalkot District, Karnataka. The project, located in Malapur Village, Mudhol Taluk, involves the expansion of the distillery’s production capacity from 700 Kilo Liters Per Day (KLPD) to 1200 KLPD, focusing on ethanol production under the Ethanol Blended Petrol (EBP) program. The production will utilize raw materials such as C-heavy molasses, B-heavy molasses, cane juice syrup, and grains. Additionally, the project includes the expansion of the captive power plant from 16 Megawatts (MW) to 24 MW.

During the review, the committee examined several key aspects of the expansion plan, including compliance with environmental norms and pending legal matters. Notably, the committee considered the ongoing court case filed by the Karnataka State Pollution Control Board (KSPCB) against TruAlt Bioenergy Limited, which remains under litigation in the court of the Judicial Magistrate First Class (JMFC) in Mudhol. Despite the legal proceedings, TruAlt Bioenergy Limited (TBL) has adhered to environmental regulations by installing an online continuous monitoring system as mandated by the norms. Moreover, the company has secured the Consent to Operate (CTO) from the KSPCB for its existing distillery operations at 700 KLPD, currently using syrup as a feedstock.

TBL has reportedly not operated distillery above 120 KLPD capacity on B Heavy or C molasses because of limitation of boiler capacity. The EAC has noted that the incineration boiler of 32 TPH is sufficient to incinerate spent wash generated during 700 KLPD operation on syrup. The installation of 80 Tons Per Hour (TPH) incineration boiler is completed. TBL has submitted an application to the KSPCB for a new 80 TPH incineration boiler. The situation raises a critical question: Can plants and machinery be commissioned without obtaining Environmental Clearance (EC)? It is apparent that TBL is seeking EC for expansion. The EAC sub-committee did not address the status or validity of the Consent-to-Establish (CTE) during its assessment, which is however accorded after EC grant.   

The site inspection further revealed that during the visit to the compost yard, no press mud storage or bio-composting activities were observed, and no percolation of spent wash was found in the area. Agricultural activities nearby were unaffected, indicating no spent wash percolation. TBL has constructed two impervious spent wash storage tanks, both in good condition and nearly empty at the time of the visit. Four piezometers installed around the area are regularly monitored, showing no groundwater contamination. The committee also tested a sample from a piezometer, confirming it was free of contamination. However, the EAC has neither posted any photographs nor cited reference ti any test reports supporting claim of contamination-free groundwater.

Interestingly, all the clean chits were issued based solely on a one-day site visit. MoEF&CC being a scientific Ministry and Experts visiting a site, there is hardly any material balance or reference cited on fly ash generation and disposal. The company has not yet attained the required green belt area of 11.55 acres. 

People are curious to know about Who is the owner of TruAlt Bioenergy, Trualt bioenergy share price, Trualt bioenergy salary, TruAlt Bioenergy Share price target 2025, TruAlt Bioenergy IPO, TruAlt Bioenergy Share price target 2024, TruAlt Bioenergy Reviews, Trualt Bioenergy IPO date, TruAlt Bioenergy founder.  Subscribe to read more

14th Sept 2024 YouTube X LinkedIn

In a significant decision, the Forest Advisory Committee, chaired by Jitendra Kumar Director General of Forest, MoEF&CC, has given "in-principle" approval for the diversion of 0.2695 hectares of forest land for the construction of a passenger ropeway at the Veer Hanuman Temple in Samod, Rajasthan. This proposal was put forward by the Mandir Shree Sitaram Ji Shree Veer Hanuman Ji Trust and was discussed during the FAC meeting held on 27th August 2024.

The proposal aimed to seek ex-post facto approval from the Central Government under Section-2 of the Forest Conservation Act, 1980, for the ropeway, which had already been constructed without prior clearance. The ropeway, facilitating access to the temple, located atop Samod Parvat near Nangal Bharda village in Jaipur district, had reportedly been completed between 2016 and 2019.

Key Observations and Findings:

1. Forest Land and Legal Status:
   The forest land in question has a protected status with a density of 0.1 and Eco-class 3. Notably, no trees are involved in the proposed diversion, as the existing ropeway infrastructure is already in place.

2. Social and Technical Considerations:
   The Government of Rajasthan stated that efforts were made to avoid using forest land for the project, but the location of the temple at the hilltop and surrounding forest made it unavoidable. The ropeway was deemed essential, especially for elderly and disabled pilgrims, who would otherwise face a strenuous climb of around 1,100 steps to reach the temple.

3. Violations and Ex-Post Facto Approval:
   The FAC noted that the ropeway had been constructed on forest land without approval. The land had not been officially mutated in the name of the forest department, although forest records identified it as such. The committee recommended that the violation be addressed by imposing a penalty, which includes paying five times the Net Present Value (NPV) of the forest land per hectare for each year of violation, along with 12% simple interest until the deposit is made.

4. Compensatory Afforestation (CA) and Other Measures:
   The user agency, a private trust, has proposed compensatory afforestation over 1 hectare of degraded forest land in Mahar Samod Main Forest Block. The total CA scheme amounts to ₹4.70 lakhs. Additionally, the agency is required to provide 1 hectare of non-forest land for penal compensatory afforestation and undertake the plantation of Ficus seedlings in and around the temple area.

5. Government Action and Future Considerations:
   The committee strongly recommended action against government officers responsible for allowing violations under Sections 3A and 3B of the Forest Conservation Act. It also imposed several other conditions, including the construction of a 6-foot boundary wall around the compensatory afforestation site and the installation of solar pumps for irrigation.

Decision:

After thorough deliberation, the FAC recommended conditional approval for the project, citing the importance of the ropeway for temple access and the public interest. However, the approval is subject to adherence to strict conditions, including penalties for violations, compensatory afforestation, and measures to ensure no further encroachments occur. The Rajasthan Government was also directed to refrain from proposing further forest land diversion for road construction to the temple in the future.

Visitors frequently search for information about the Veer Hanuman Ji Temple in Samod, Rajasthan, including details on its location, ropeway ticket prices, and accommodation options. Queries often include how to book tickets for the Veer Hanuman Ji Samod ropeway, availability of Dharamshala booking at the temple, and access to high-definition photos of the temple. Additionally, people seek information on the temple’s visiting hours and the timing of services at Samod Balaji Mandir. Subscribe to read more

9th Sept 2024 YouTube X LinkedIn

The Expert Appraisal Committee (EAC) for Thermal Projects under the Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change (MoEF&CC) has deferred the proposal by Haryana Power Generation Corporation Limited (HPGCL) to expand the Deen Bandhu Chhotu Ram Thermal Power Plant (DCRTPP) in Yamuna Nagar, Haryana.

#HPGCL sought environmental clearance (EC) for installing a new 1x800 MW supercritical unit alongside the existing 2x300 MW coal-based units. During its 12th meeting held on 29 August 2024, the EAC raised several concerns, including non-compliance with existing EC conditions. Notably, the ash content of coal currently being used is 48.30%, exceeding the permitted 34%.

The EAC also flagged issues related to poor air quality management, high particulate matter levels exceeding National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS), inadequate ash disposal plans, and the absence of a comprehensive action plan to reduce water consumption in the water-deficit area in the environment impact assessment report. For detailed reports subscribe/be a member

21st August 2024 YouTube X LinkedIn

The Ministry of Ports, Shipping, and Waterways (MoPSW) has faced significant pushback from environmental experts and regulatory bodies over its proposal to exempt floating jetties from environmental clearance requirements.

The MoPSW had initially requested this exemption in April 2022, citing potential benefits for coastal development and infrastructure. However, the Expert Appraisal Committee (EAC) has consistently raised concerns about the potential environmental impacts of these floating structures.

In its latest assessment, the EAC highlighted several key issues, including:

• Lack of clarity on environmental impact: The MoPSW has failed to provide sufficient information on the potential ecological consequences of floating jetties in sensitive areas such as coral reefs, mangroves, and seagrass beds.

• Security concerns: The EAC expressed concerns about the potential security risks associated with floating jetties, particularly in coastal areas.

• Regulatory oversight: The proposal lacks clear guidelines for monitoring and managing these structures, raising questions about how to prevent environmental damage.

• Environmental organizations and experts have also voiced their opposition to the proposal, arguing that floating jetties could harm marine ecosystems and disrupt fragile coastal habitats.

In light of these concerns, the EAC has deferred its decision on the exemption request, demanding that the MoPSW provide more detailed information and address the outstanding issues. It remains to be seen whether the ministry will be able to satisfy the EAC's requirements and secure the necessary approvals for its floating jetty project.

19th August 2024 YouTube X LinkedIn

Tamil Nadu Cements Corporation Limited (TANCEM) has been charged with an environmental damage compensation of Rs. 3.32 crore by the Tamil Nadu SEIAA. TANCEM has previously operating without environmental clearance of 180.83-hectare limestone mines in Virudhunagar District. The period of violation has been said to be 1,108 days. 

13th August 2024 YouTube X LinkedIn

A recent document from the Ministry of Environment, Forest, and Climate Change (MoEF&CC) has brought to light significant concerns regarding the environmental compliance of Rallis India Ltd., a key player in the agrochemical manufacturing sector. The 83rd Expert Appraisal Committee (EAC) meeting, held on 31st July and 1st August 2024 under the chairmanship of Prof. (Dr.) A.B. Pandit, deliberated on a proposal by Rallis India Ltd. to amalgamate the Environmental Clearances (ECs) granted to its two units located in the Dahej Special Economic Zone, Bharuch District, Gujarat. The units were granted ECs on 17th March 2009 (Unit-I) and 16th February 2016 (Unit-II) for the manufacturing of agrochemicals.

Incomplete Compliance Raises Concerns

The proposal for amalgamation has raised serious questions about Rallis India's adherence to the environmental conditions set by the MoEF&CC. Notably, Unit-I, which was granted clearance in 2009, still has four (4) conditions that have only been partially complied with, and three (3) conditions that the company has merely agreed to comply with but has yet to fulfill. Similarly, Unit-II, cleared in 2016, has thirteen (13) outstanding conditions. These lapses indicate potential deficiencies in the monitoring standards of the Ministry's Regional Office, which is responsible for ensuring compliance with environmental regulations.

Amalgamation and Environmental Claims: Ambiguities and Doubts

Rallis India has claimed that the proposed amalgamation would lead to significant environmental benefits, including a reduction of 1.66 metric tons of CO2 emissions per month due to a savings of 2322 KWH of electricity through a common facility operation. However, the company has not provided clarity on whether this CO2 reduction would occur at the industry level or if it reflects savings by the power supply company. Such ambiguity raises concerns about the transparency and accuracy of the environmental impact assessment provided by the company.

Manure Generation and Consumption Claim 

The company has also claimed that it generates 100 kg/day of manure from wet garbage processing and another 100 kg/day from sewage treatment plant (STP) sludge, totaling 200 kg/day of manure for greenbelt development within its premises. 

However, it remains unclear whether the company’s claims are supported by a scientific mass balance, raising concerns about the accuracy of the reported figures. Additionally, the EAC has not addressed whether the company clarified the actual manure demand for the plantation and trees. The absence of detailed information on these points undermines confidence in the effectiveness and validity of the company’s environmental strategies.

Plantation Compliance Issues

The EAC highlighted a significant shortfall in Rallis India Ltd.’s compliance with its EC conditions related to plantation. According to the EC granted on 17th March 2009, Rallis India was required to plant 19,000 trees. However, as of the recent evaluation, the company has only managed to plant 2,188 trees. This substantial gap raises concerns about the effectiveness and credibility of the monitoring conducted by the Ministry's Regional Office.

In response to this non-compliance, the EAC has merely sought a detailed month-wise action plan to achieve the remaining plantation target during the current monsoon season. The feasibility and practicality of this new timeline remain questionable, particularly given the company’s historical failure in meeting its environmental obligations. 

Hazardous Waste Management Concerns

In terms of hazardous waste management, Rallis India has proposed a common storage area for hazardous waste following the amalgamation of its units. The company asserts that this consolidation will mitigate the risk of soil and water contamination. Despite these claims, there has been no statement on any independent verification by the Ministry or the EAC regarding existing soil or water contamination since 2009. There is no reference to any comparison of baseline data used for 2009 EC and the current appraisal. 

The EAC also noted that under the 2009 EC, Rallis India was required to recycle 40% of the effluent generated from its existing plant. However, in its amalgamation proposal, the company has proposed a combined effluent treatment plant (ETP) for both units. The EAC suggested augmenting the recycling capacity to include an additional 560 m³/day of treated effluent, indicating that there is substantial room for improvement in the company’s effluent management practices. Additionally, the EAC has demanded an action plan for the disposal of fly ash and details regarding the installation of an online monitoring system for stack and water quality.

Furthermore, the Committee has asked Rallis India to submit details of the Best Available Technology (BAT) to be adopted in the manufacturing process.

The decision on Rallis India's proposal for the amalgamation of ECs has been deferred by the EAC. 

7th August 2024 YouTube X LinkedIn

Aloke Steels Pvt. Ltd. has formally requested the surrender of its existing Environmental Clearance (EC) granted for its expansion project. The company submitted an online application seeking to relinquish the EC issued by the Ministry on 23rd July 2018, and its corrigendum dated 8th August 2019.

The steel plant, which commenced operations following a Consent to Establish (CTE) from the Jharkhand State Pollution Control Board (JSPCB) in April 2005, is currently operating under a Consent to Operate (CTO) valid until 30th September 2025. Despite the EC for an extensive expansion— including a new steel melting shop, rolling mill, iron ore crushing plant, and other facilities—Aloke Steels has not implemented any of these additions.

The company has cited market viability issues as the reason for the surrender of the original EC. They plan to obtain a fresh EC with revised plant configurations and capacities that better reflect current market conditions. This move is in compliance with the Ministry's Office Memorandum dated 29th March 2022, which governs the process for surrendering ECs.

The Expert Appraisal Committee (EAC) reviewed the proposal and found it in alignment with the Ministry’s guidelines. The EAC confirmed that the provided documents met the necessary requirements, making the proposal eligible for consideration. Aloke Steels has also received Terms of Reference (ToR) for the new expansion plan, as of January 18, 2024, indicating ongoing efforts to update their environmental compliance framework.

1st August 2024 YouTube X LinkedIn

In its 128th meeting, the Expert Appraisal Committee (EAC) of the Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change, responsible for appraising Infrastructure (Infra 2) projects, addressed complaints against the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Consultant concerning three proposals. These proposals involve major residential and commercial developments in Bengaluru, Karnataka, spearheaded by Godrej Properties Ltd. and Universal Metro Properties LLP.

The complaints specifically targeted the Environmental Clearance (EC) process for three projects: a proposed residential apartment building in Hommadevanahalli village, Begur Hobli, Bangalore South Taluk by Godrej Properties Ltd.; the expansion and modification of the "Godrej Ananda" residential apartment project in Bagalur village by Universal Metro Properties LLP; and a proposed residential and commercial development in Konadasapura Village, Bidarahalli Hobli by Godrej Properties Ltd.

The EAC, chaired by Mr. Ram Kumar, noted that these three proposals were initially examined and recommended for EC during the committee's 115th meeting on December 20, 2023. However, the Ministry later received a complaint alleging that the EIA Coordinator, accredited for Category 8(a) projects, had inappropriately prepared the EIA/EMP report for Category 8(b) projects.

In response, the Ministry sought clarification from the project proponents and the EIA consultant. Following their replies, the matter was referred back to the EAC for further examination.

The EAC conducted a thorough review of the replies, focusing on the points raised in the complaint. After detailed deliberation, the committee concluded that the EIA report needed revalidation by the accredited consultant using 15 days of field-based data. Once the revalidated report is submitted through the PARIVESH portal as an Additional Document Submission (ADS) reply, the EAC will reappraise the matter.

Moreover, the EAC has issued a warning to the Accredited EIA Consultant Organization and the EIA Coordinator, emphasizing the importance of adhering to proper accreditation categories in future assessments to prevent similar issues. Interestingly, the EAC document does not reveal the name of the EIA consultant. The EIA/EMP report prepared for Godrej Properties Ltd., uploaded on the PARIVESH portal, shows the EIA consultant's name as "Environ India" located at Rashtriya Vidyalaya Rd, 2nd Block, Basavanagudi, Bengaluru, Karnataka.  

30th July 2024 YouTube X LinkedIn

The Expert Appraisal Committee (EAC) of the Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change has recently recommended the grant of environmental clearance (EC) for several significant non-coal mining expansion projects in India. 

Among the projects approved is the expansion of the Sanu-I Limestone Mine operated by Rajasthan State Mines and Minerals Limited. The EAC has endorsed Stage II expansion of the mine, allowing an increase of up to 40% over the base EC capacity issued on August 3, 2007. This recommendation aligns with the Ministry's Office Memorandum dated April 11, 2022, which falls under paragraph 7(ii) of the EIA Notification, 2006, and its subsequent amendments. The project proponent (PP) submitted a map verified by the Forest Department, indicating that the Great Indian Bustard (GIB) Priority Area is approximately 1.45 kilometers away from the mine lease boundary. Furthermore, the Desert National Park is situated 45 kilometers from the mining site, with no current impacts on the park or its wildlife observed. However, the EAC has emphasized the need for additional conservation measures to protect the GIB, including the installation of high-quality bird diverters on all high-tension and low-tension power lines within the lease area.

Additionally, the EAC has approved the capacity expansion of Bailadila Iron Ore Mine, Deposit-5, operated by NMDC Limited. This project, located in Bacheli, South Bastar Dantewada District, Chhattisgarh, will increase its capacity from 10 million tonnes per annum (MTPA) to 12 MTPA, representing a 20% expansion.

The committee also granted approval for extending the validity of the Environmental Clearance for Rajashree Limestone Mine No. 2. This project, run by UltraTech Cement Limited at Villages Basni, Tehsil Merta, District Nagaur, Rajasthan, involves expanding limestone production capacity from 0.45 MTPA to 1.0 MTPA and installing a 400 TPH crusher within a 400.70-hectare mine lease area.

Further approvals include the expansion of Amli Limestone Mine, also managed by UltraTech Cement Limited, which will increase limestone production from 6.35 million tonnes per annum (MTPA) to 8.85 MTPA. The project involves additional excavation and a crusher capacity of 1700 TPH. The nearest water body, Bilar Nadi, is situated about 0.5 kilometers to the north-northwest, and 50 trees will be transplanted as part of the project.

The EAC also approved the expansion of Thandiberi Limestone Mine, which will boost production capacity from 1.065 MTPA to 6.00 MTPA, with a total excavation of 7.60 MTPA. This project includes a proposed crusher capacity of 1700 TPH and involves the transplantation of 20 trees.

The Jonnagiri Gold Mine Project, operated by Geomysore Services (India) Limited, has been cleared for the mining and processing of gold ore with a ROM capacity of 0.4 MTPA and an ore processing plant capacity of 0.3 MTPA. The mine is located adjacent to the Ura Vanka and Lingala Vanka water bodies.

Lastly, the EAC recommended the expansion of Choutapalli Limestone Mine-II by My Home Industries Private Limited, which will increase production from 2.72 MTPA to 5.0 MTPA. The total excavation will amount to 5.582 MTPA, with a canal situated 0.05 kilometers west of the lease area.

An amendment in the Environmental Clearance dated May 30, 2022, for the Surda Copper Mine operated by Hindustan Copper Ltd. has also been approved. This project, located in several villages and forest blocks in East Singhbhum, Jharkhand, will enable the production of 0.9 million tonnes per annum (ROM).

Subscribe now for exclusive access to in-depth reports and stay ahead with our detailed environmental news coverage!

17th July 2024 YouTube X LinkedIn

The Expert Appraisal Committee (EAC) of the Ministry of Environment, Forest, and Climate Change (MoEF&CC) reconvened on June 27, 2024, for its 11th meeting to reconsider the Maa Ratangarh Multipurpose Project, previously known as the Sindh (Seondha) Barrage project, near Dangdiroli village in Seondha Tehsil, Datia District, Madhya Pradesh. The proposal was submitted by the Water Resource Division, Government of Madhya Pradesh, District Gwalior. The project includes significant submergence of forest land, with 1,269.582 Subscribe now for exclusive access to in-depth reports and stay ahead with our detailed environmental news coverage!

17th July 2024 YouTube X LinkedIn

The Expert Appraisal Committee (EAC) of the Ministry of Environment, Forest, and Climate Change (MoEF&CC) in its 11th meeting discussed on site visit report pertaining to the proposal for the Bilaspur Closed Loop Pumped Storage Project, submitted by Jindal Renewable Power Private Limited. This project aims to establish a 1000 MW capacity facility spanning 301.5 hectares in Village Manjurpah and Karichhaper, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh.

Earlier, the EAc had observed that the project lacked justification for sourcing water from the Khutaghat dam, located approximately 16 kilometers from the proposed lower reservoir, with unknown water availability. Additionally, concerns were raised over the project's proximity to the Achanakmar Tiger Reserve and the need to confirm the presence of tiger corridors in the area. The project site, situated within dense Sal Forests of high ecological value, further compounded these concerns.

As a result of these observations, the EAC decided to defer the project and constituted a sub-committee to conduct a site inspection. The inspection, scheduled for May 10-12, 2024, aimed to assess the forest status and evaluate alternative project locations proposed by the proponent. The sub-committee included members chaired by Ajay Kumar Lal, with Dr. Antony Johnson and Munna Kumar Shah as members.

Following the site inspection, the sub-committee presented its findings and recommendations. Key recommendations included the requirement for Stage-I Forest Clearance prior to any further consideration for Environmental Clearance (EC), detailed documentation on species diversity, and comprehensive Conservation Area (CA) plans. Additionally, specifics regarding the 16-kilometer pipeline for water withdrawal, including land requirements and soil disturbance details, were deemed integral to the proposal.

Other recommendations focused on obtaining necessary permissions for water allocation from the State Government and Mahanadi Water Dispute Tribunal, exploring alternatives to minimize dumping areas, and establishing ambient air quality monitoring stations in nearby villages. The project proponent was also advised to explore alternate access roads and solid waste management plans.

In conclusion, while the project is pending approval of Terms of Reference (ToR), these comprehensive recommendations underscore the EAC's commitment to ensuring rigorous environmental assessment and mitigation measures for the Bilaspur Closed Loop Pumped Storage Project.

8th July 2024 YouTube X LinkedIn

Discover how the State Environment Impact Assessment Authority (SEIAA), Odisha, achieved a rare "Perfect Ten" on July 2, 2024. All ten environmental clearance proposals were approved in one go! Learn about the new projects, including Mayfair Bay Resort's luxurious hotel in Jagatsinghpur, and the high-profile residential apartment "9 Emporio" in Khordha. Uncover the details behind the expansion of iron ore mines, stone quarries, and river sand extraction projects. Want to know more? Subscribe now for exclusive access to in-depth reports and stay ahead with our detailed environmental news coverage!

7th July 2024 YouTube X LinkedIn

The State Environment Impact Assessment Authority (SEIAA) of Gujarat has granted environmental clearance for a granite mining project at Eklara Village in the Sabarkantha District. The clearance document, dated July 3, 2024, has sparked discussions due to several ambiguities and potential oversights.

The project, known as Eklara Granite Block-4, involves the extraction of granite through semi-mechanized open-cast mining without blasting. The SEIAA has stipulated that the mining depth is to be restricted to 6.0 meters, with post-mining land restoration also to occur at the same depth. The overburden material generated during the mining process is to be stacked on-site and subsequently used for backfilling once mining operations cease.

The environmental clearance document lists an Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) consultant whose NABET accreditation validity appears confusing. The document indicates a validity date of 18/010/2024, raising questions about whether the intended date was 18th January 2024. If the latter, the accreditation would already be invalid, undermining the legitimacy of the EIA process.

Another contentious point is the water requirement for the project. The SEIAA has declared that the project will require 6 KLD (kiloliters per day) of water, to be supplied by nearby tanker providers. Critics argue that this description is unscientific and degrades the essence of an Environmental Impact Assessment. The SEIAA and the State Expert Appraisal Committee (SEAC) have not ensured clarity on the actual sources of water, such as groundwater, surface water, marine water, or treated wastewater, from which the tanker suppliers will source. Accepting the term "tanker suppliers" without specification is perceived by some as tacitly legalizing potentially unauthorized water extraction practices.

Additionally, while the project proponent has asserted that the project lies outside any Eco-Sensitive Zone (ESZ) and Coastal Regulation Zone (CRZ), the SEIAA has mandated a precautionary measure. Should it be discovered that the project encroaches on no-go areas, including forests, future ESZs, or submerged areas, the proponent must submit a revised map excluding these areas for approval.

The clearance of this project brings to light ongoing concerns about the robustness and transparency of the environmental clearance process. Stakeholders are calling for greater scrutiny and clearer guidelines to ensure environmental integrity and sustainable resource management in Gujarat.

Avail a Paid Subscription for Daily Email Updates ₹600/= per year. Pay through UPI to 9313385043@kotak and then send your email id through WhatsApp message to 9312491427

6th July 2024 YouTube X LinkedIn

Exciting updates from Punjab's State Environment Impact Assessment Authority (SEIAA)! On 2nd July 2024, several key environmental clearance decisions were made. Discover why the expansion of "Rajgarh Estates Phase – 2 Extension" was rejected and learn about the newly approved projects in SAS Nagar, including high-profile developments by Vigilant Media Pvt. Ltd., Prisma Residency LLP, and more. Plus, get the details on the EC transfers for major industrial units. Stay tuned for a deep dive into these pivotal decisions impacting Punjab's environmental landscape! 

SUBSCRIBE for detailed report. Paid Subscription for Daily Email Updates ₹600/= per year. Pay through UPI to 9313385043@kotak and then send your email id through WhatsApp message to 9312491427

2nd July 2024 YouTube X LinkedIn

The Expert Appraisal Committee (EAC) of the Ministry of Environment, Forest, and Climate Change held its highly anticipated 10th meeting on 10th June 2024, chaired by Dr. Sharad Singh Negi. The session saw discussions on two significant proposals, notably the expansion plans of Ind-Barath Energy (Utkal) Ltd (IBEUL), a subsidiary of JSW Energy Ltd.

IBEUL Expansion Proposal

The spotlight was on IBEUL’s proposal to expand its Coal-Based Thermal Power Plant (TPP) from 1x350 MW to 2x350 MW in Sahajbahal Village, Jharsuguda District, Odisha. This proposal, set in an ecologically sensitive zone, seeks to stretch over 240 hectares, with the Hirakud Reservoir merely 500 meters to the west. The project also involves diverting 35.98 hectares of forest land, an issue further complicated by previous violations by Ind-Barath Energy regarding forest land diversion.

Environmental and Health Implications

One of the pressing concerns raised was the severe water requirement of 54,600 KL/MWh for the expanded TPP. The proposed site lies within the Ib Valley cluster, notoriously categorized as a severely polluted area. This region, spanning 580 km², already grapples with significant environmental stress.

The plant plans to use 14,700 TPD of coal and 1,500 KL/annum of LDO as fuel, resulting in an annual generation of 1,572,420 tonnes of fly ash and 393,470 tonnes of bottom ash. Despite these staggering figures, the EAC document lacked precise units for bottom ash generation. Potential coal suppliers include Mahanadi Coalfields and NLCIL/Talabira II and III OCP.

Scrutiny and Recommendations

EAC members scrutinized the coal quantity, pointing out the higher-than-expected volume due to the inferior grade of coal proposed. They emphasized the necessity for IBEUL to ascertain the pollution load based on coal quality and implement mitigative measures with budget provisions in the Environmental Management Plan (EMP). The committee also demanded detailed incremental GLC values for PM10 and PM2.5, both with and without protection measures.

An intriguing aspect noted was a school's proximity—just 0.6 km from the plant boundary—raising concerns about the health and safety of children. The committee has asked IBEUL to explore the possibility of relocating the school to a safer distance.

A Puzzling Mix-Up

Adding to the session's complexity was a confusing entry in the EAC document. The headline of item 2 referenced a proposal by Neyveli Uttar Pradesh Power Ltd. (NUPPL) for an EC amendment for the 3x660 MW Ghatampur Thermal Power Station in Kanpur Nagar, Uttar Pradesh. However, the description contrasted sharply, detailing an expansion of NTPC Ltd.’s existing 2980 MW project by adding 1x800 MW in Chhattisgarh. This discrepancy led to questions about the integrity and accuracy of the government committee's documentation.

Enviro Annotations reviewed the EAC's document. It reflects NUPPL’s proposal to amend existing EC conditions pertaining to CSR. The company has sought to delete commitments related to earmarking funds for CSR activities during construction and operation phases, as well as conditions requiring CSR schemes to be implemented in consultation with local Panchayats and District Administration. Furthermore, they requested the removal of mandates for periodic CSR monitoring and evaluation by external agencies. 

The EAC has just deferred this contentious proposal, seeking more documents.

26th June 2024 YouTube X LinkedIn

The Expert Appraisal Committee (EAC) for Industry 1 Sector projects of the Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change has granted its approval to JSW Steel Ltd's proposal for the division of its existing Environmental Clearance (EC) at Vijayanagar works, Toranagallu, Ballari, Karnataka. The decision, rendered on 12th June 2024, marks a significant milestone for JSW Steel Ltd, JSW Vijayanagar Metallics Limited (JVML), and JSW Cement Limited (JSWCL).

Under the approved plan, the configuration will be finalized as follows: JSW Steel Ltd will operate with a 13 MTPA steel production capacity, alongside a 1490 MW Captive Power Plant (CPP) and a 0.2 MTPA slag cement unit. Furthermore, 5 MTPA of steel production will be transferred to JVML, while JSWCL will receive a 2 MTPA slag grinding unit, which will integrate into its existing 4 MTPA slag cement plant.

The EAC, chaired by Rajive Kumar, IFS Retd., meticulously reviewed the revised split EC conditions and additional EC stipulations. The committee's focus was on ensuring robust mitigation measures that are comprehensive and effective. Key considerations included the clear delineation of responsibilities among the split units to prevent overlaps and to ensure diligent implementation.

Emphasizing the importance of compliance and monitoring frameworks, the EAC underscored the necessity for continuous stakeholder engagement and effective risk management strategies. Moreover, the committee advised the project proponents to assess cumulative impacts across units, promote sustainable practices, and uphold stringent adherence to legal and regulatory frameworks.

In a forward-looking recommendation, the EAC suggested adaptive management approaches, advocating for the continual improvement of mitigation measures based on monitoring results and new data.

Furthermore, in alignment with environmental stewardship initiatives, the EAC advised implementing the 'Ek Ped Maa Ke Naam' Campaign. Launched on 5th June 2024, World Environment Day, this nationwide afforestation drive aims to increase forest cover across the country, distinct from the mandatory green belt development.

YouTube X LinkedIn 

19.06.2024

The Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change (MoEF&CC) has released the decisions of the recent deliberations conducted by the Expert Appraisal Committee (EAC) for Industrial Projects in the Industry 3 Sector. The meeting, chaired by Prof. (Dr.) A.B. Pandit, took place from June 6th to June 7th, 2024. It scrutinized various project proposals and rendered significant decisions.

One of the proposals examined was from Asha Resins Pvt. Ltd. The company has announced an ambitious expansion plan to significantly increase the production capacities at its facility located in Dhanore Village under Khed Tahsil of Pune District in Maharashtra. The expansion includes scaling up the manufacturing volumes for various formulations and chemicals, alongside an increase in the greenbelt area to promote environmental sustainability.

However, the proposal discussed in the EAC was about amendment in EC. This proposal includes substantial changes to the existing greenbelt.

The current greenbelt covers a modest 13.9% of the total project area, amounting to 905 square meters. The existing vegetation consists of 30 trees of various species such as Coconut, Mango, Guava, Ashoka, Gulmohar, Tamarind, and Nilgiri. This green space, spanning 0.218 hectares, represents 33.53% of the project's total area. While the company touts this as a green initiative, the actual area dedicated to greenery is minimal and raises questions about the company's environmental priorities.

The proposed amendment claims to increase the greenbelt to 40.2% of the total project area, translating to 2618 square meters. This includes the existing 905 square meters and an additional 1713 square meters on land provided by the Dhanore village Gram panchayat. Although this appears to be a significant increase, it is essential to scrutinize the real intent and feasibility of this plan. The new total greenbelt area will cover 0.2618 hectares, or 40.2% of the project area. The number of trees is also set to increase from the existing 30 to a proposed total of 590, by adding 560 new trees. The proposed tree density is ambitious at 2500 trees per hectare, but it raises concerns about the practicality of maintaining such a high density in the long run.

However, the land to develop greenbelt to be utilized is from the village and not owned by the company. Further, the timeline for greenbelt development has also been pushed back from June to September 2023 to June to September 2024, suggesting potential delays and a lack of urgency.

Several critical issues must be highlighted regarding this proposed expansion. Firstly, the reliance on additional land from the Grampanchayat raises questions about the sustainability and long-term viability of the greenbelt. The use of public land for private greenbelt expansion can have adverse effects on the local community and environment. Furthermore, the high tree density of 2500 trees per hectare is questionable, as maintaining such a dense plantation may not be feasible, leading to potential tree mortality and a failure to achieve the desired environmental benefits.

The EAC has outlined additional requirements for the proposed amendment, including compliance with the latest guidelines for handling styrene. This is a critical issue, given the hazardous nature of styrene and the potential risks to both the environment and public health. The need for a revised layout map incorporating the proposed expansions and enhanced safety measures underscores the inadequacy of the current plan. Additionally, obtaining approval from the Department of Panchayati Raj for the use of additional greenbelt land adds another layer of complexity and potential delay.

YouTube X LinkedIn 

17.06.2024

The Expert Appraisal Committee (EAC) of the Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change for the appraisal of Coal Mining Projects, deferred the proposal of South Eastern Coalfields Limited (SECL). SECL has sought revalidation of Environmental Clearance (EC) of Singhali Underground Coal Mine Project; located at Singhali village in Korba DIstrict of Chhattisgarh. The application of SECL is based on as per S.O. No. 1530(E) dated 06/04/2018 for its Mine Lease area of 862.289 Ha with capacity 0.42 MTPA. According to the EAC document there was excess production beyond the EC sanctioned capacity from 2001-02 to 2005-06. 

According to the EAC document, the NOC from the Central Ground Water Authority (CGWA) for the extraction of 10,328 m³/day of groundwater was valid until 22.04.2023. The EAC has failed to present this information in a transparent and simplified manner. It was stated that SECL, via a letter dated 08.05.2024, submitted that the renewal application for obtaining the groundwater NOC is in process and that the groundwater abstraction charges were deposited to the CGWA on 25.04.202_. However, the information does not clarify whether the year is 2023 or 2024. Additionally, SECL sent emails to CGWA on 26.04.2023, 29.07.2023, 12.12.2023, 01.01.2024, and 07.02.2024 requesting the renewal of the NOC. The EAC disclosed that the renewal application was approved by the Evaluation Officer on 26.12.2023 and is currently pending with the Approval Officer. Furthermore, the Committee noted that SECL did not submit the current water requirement. According to the previous EC, the water requirement is 160 m³/day. Hence, EA reviews the dates and data provided are extremely confusing. 

The EAC deferred the proposal, asking SECL to submit compliance with the issuance of a Public Notice as per the provisions of the EIA Notification 2006 (as amended) in conjunction with the OM dated 16.02.2021, and to prepare a mine closure plan for the capacity and area for which re-validation of the EC is required. 

YouTube X LinkedIn 

03.06.2024

The Ministry of Environment, Forest, and Climate Change has disclosed the verdicts of the Expert Appraisal Committee (EAC) concerning infrastructure projects, ship breaking yards, and industrial developments, among others, discussed during the EAC Infra-1 meeting on 15th May  2024. 

Google has posted that search interest in “age gap” has reached a record high in May with “what is the age gap in the idea of you” being a top trending question. How does this relate to current affairs environment? An EC of 2017 is amended in 2024 without pollution load assessment. The EAC revisited the proposal by the Delhi Mumbai Industrial Corridor Development Corporation (DMICDC) Ltd. for amending the Environmental Clearance (EC) regarding the Bidkin Industrial Area (BIA) in Maharashtra. The amendment seeks to expand the list of permissible industries based on an EIA report, reflecting a shift from the originally planned seven categories to twelve.

The expanded list of industries encompasses sectors like Food and Beverages, Pharmaceuticals, Rubber and Plastic Products, and Textiles, among others. However, concerns have arisen regarding the discrepancies in the number of industries proposed and the rationale behind the EC amendment. Despite assurances by the project proponent and EIA consultant regarding data accuracy, questions linger about the environmental implications and the adequacy of mitigation measures, particularly concerning pollution load.

Another significant project under scrutiny is the proposed expansion of the Waterfront Development Plan at Mundra Port by Adani Ports & SEZ Ltd. The project entails handling additional cargo capacity and necessitates both EC and Coastal Regulation Zone Clearance (CRZC). While the project promises infrastructural growth, including a desalination plant, wastewater management, and afforestation efforts, concerns persist over its environmental impact, particularly regarding mangrove conservation and the preservation of Schedule-I species like the Indian peafowl and Olive Ridley turtles. The EAC has recommended the project for clearance but with stringent conditions to address these concerns comprehensively.

Furthermore, the EAC has given the green light to the Andhra Pradesh Industrial Infrastructure Corporation (APIIC) Ltd.'s proposal for an Industrial Park in Visakhapatnam District. The park aims to host various industries, including Pharmaceuticals, Electronics, and Food Processing. Despite the project's potential for industrial growth, questions remain regarding its environmental impact, wastewater management, and wildlife conservation efforts, emphasizing the need for stringent monitoring and adherence to EC conditions to ensure sustainable development. In the vicinity of the Bay of Bengal, the project area sees the prominence of sea waves not as the backdrop for trending video games like "Wuthering Waves," but as a matter of serious concern. 

YouTube X LinkedIn 

16.05.2024

The Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change has unveiled the outcomes of the recent deliberations conducted by the Expert Appraisal Committee (EAC) for Industrial Projects in the Industry 2 Sector. The meeting, spanning from 2nd May to 3rd May 2024, scrutinized proposals and rendered crucial verdicts on various projects, highlighting both approvals and deferments.

The EAC examined Oasis Ethanol Industries' proposition for expanding its operations in Ambala, Haryana, which involved adding a 180 KLD Grain-based Ethanol Plant to its existing setup. While the proposal showcased substantial plans for growth, concerns were raised regarding water sourcing, emission control mechanisms, and safety protocols, particularly in light of recent fire incidents. Additionally, discrepancies in risk assessment methodologies prompted the committee to demand a revised plan for a comprehensive evaluation.

IMFA's bid to establish a 120 KLD Grain-Based Ethanol Plant in Rayagada, Odisha, faced deferment as the EAC underscored various unresolved issues. Despite commendable efforts to enhance green areas and promote sustainable practices, gaps in documentation and layout discrepancies necessitated further clarification from the company.

Atvo Agrochem's proposal for a 120 KLD Grain-Based Distillery Plant in Rajasthan encountered postponement due to safety concerns and regulatory compliance issues. The presence of high-tension lines and discrepancies in water usage plans raised red flags, prompting the committee to demand a comprehensive reassessment and clearer documentation before reconsideration.

EA points out that, the figure for maximum impact zones given in the assessment, 847 m, 1.2 km, and 1.7 km, considered only a single tank scenario, remains exactly same in two projects. It is unclear whether the EAC noted this. Or, is it coincidence, or plagiarism or as per any rules and standards for assessment?

The proposition by Binny New Re-Energy Limited to establish a grain-based distillery unit and co-generation power plant in Tamil Nadu faced deferral over concerns regarding emission control and land usage. The committee emphasized stringent adherence to environmental norms and a thorough risk assessment before progressing further.

Baramati Agro Limited's request for an amendment to expand its facility in Maharashtra was returned, with the EAC recommending a broader modernization approach. The committee stressed the importance of comprehensive planning and updated environmental management strategies for sustainable expansion.

The application of Core Green Sugars and Fuels Pvt. Ltd. for an amendment in Karnataka faced rejection, highlighting the need for clarity on land use and a detailed chronology of environmental compliance measures.

Haldia Petrochemicals' proposal to augment its operations in West Bengal was deferred due to concerns over water consumption and environmental impact. The committee called for optimized green spaces and a comprehensive risk assessment before reconsideration.

Shraddha Energy's bid to expand its distillery operations in Maharashtra faced scrutiny over discrepancies in project details and financial documentation, necessitating further justification from the company.

On a positive note, TruAlt Bioenergy Ltd. Unit-IV and ONGC Limited received recommendations for EC for their respective projects in Karnataka and Maharashtra, highlighting the importance of robust environmental management and adherence to regulatory standards.